2022
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular evolution algorithm for ligand design in DOCK

Abstract: As a complement to virtual screening, de novo design of small molecules is an alternative approach for identifying potential drug candidates. Here, we present a new 3D genetic algorithm to evolve molecules through breeding, mutation, fitness pressure, and selection. The method, termed DOCK_GA, builds upon and leverages powerful sampling, scoring, and searching routines previously implemented into DOCK6. Three primary experiments were used during development: Single‐molecule evolution evaluated three selection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted previously, , chemical searching in DOCK_DN can lead to molecules with identical topology but different conformations and/or binding poses. In the present work, to simplify interpretation of D3N outcomes, “duplicate” molecules were removed by (1) grouping all molecules for a given experiment into a single MOL2 file, (2) clustering the molecules based on topological identity using SMILES strings, and (3) retaining only those molecules with the best score depending on the experiment (internal energy, SGE, or MGE).…”
Section: Computational Methods and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As noted previously, , chemical searching in DOCK_DN can lead to molecules with identical topology but different conformations and/or binding poses. In the present work, to simplify interpretation of D3N outcomes, “duplicate” molecules were removed by (1) grouping all molecules for a given experiment into a single MOL2 file, (2) clustering the molecules based on topological identity using SMILES strings, and (3) retaining only those molecules with the best score depending on the experiment (internal energy, SGE, or MGE).…”
Section: Computational Methods and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The maximum number of scaffold fragments that could be added to any molecule at each layer of growth (dn_max_scaffolds_per_layer) was capped at 1 and the maximum number unsatisfied attachment points per molecule (dn_max_current_aps) at any point was set to 5, which helps control branching. 20 As noted previously, 20,26 chemical searching in DOCK_DN can lead to molecules with identical topology but different conformations and/or binding poses. In the present work, to simplify interpretation of D3N outcomes, "duplicate" molecules were removed by (1) grouping all molecules for a given experiment into a single MOL2 file, (2) clustering the molecules based on topological identity using SMILES strings, and (3) retaining only those molecules with the best score depending on the experiment (internal energy, SGE, or MGE).…”
Section: Dock_dn Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations