Abstract:SUMMARYAn antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) was developed for detection and identification of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) serotypes Arkansas, Connecticut, and Massachusetts using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to the S1 glycoprotein of the respective serotype. The assay (designed as a doubleantibody sandwich assay) gave the best results when the S1-specific MAb, antigen, and chicken serum were of the same serotype. However, when a group-specific (M glycoprotein-specific) … Show more
“…Because of these relatively high amounts of virus that are needed for detection by antigen ELISA, the sensitivity for detecting IBV antigen directly in chicken organs is low. Naqi et al (1993) failed to detect IBV by ELISA in tracheas of susceptible chickens after inoculation, while Nagano et al (1990) reported that the ELISA detected IBV for only 2 days, while virus was isolated for at least 7 days (the end of the experiment). Ignjatovic & Ashton (1996) could not detect antigen by ELISA after infection of chickens with a commercial vaccine, but did isolate the virus.…”
The detection methods for infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) are reviewed. Advantages and disadvantages of available techniques of IBV detection by virus isolation, antigen or genome detection, and serology are discussed. Factors of influence on the level of success in detection of IBV after a disease outbreak are discussed, as are the possibilities and dangers of strain classification by protectotyping, serotyping, epitope-typing and genotyping.
“…Because of these relatively high amounts of virus that are needed for detection by antigen ELISA, the sensitivity for detecting IBV antigen directly in chicken organs is low. Naqi et al (1993) failed to detect IBV by ELISA in tracheas of susceptible chickens after inoculation, while Nagano et al (1990) reported that the ELISA detected IBV for only 2 days, while virus was isolated for at least 7 days (the end of the experiment). Ignjatovic & Ashton (1996) could not detect antigen by ELISA after infection of chickens with a commercial vaccine, but did isolate the virus.…”
The detection methods for infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) are reviewed. Advantages and disadvantages of available techniques of IBV detection by virus isolation, antigen or genome detection, and serology are discussed. Factors of influence on the level of success in detection of IBV after a disease outbreak are discussed, as are the possibilities and dangers of strain classification by protectotyping, serotyping, epitope-typing and genotyping.
“…Con A-S-ELISA did not detect IBV antigens in trachea and lung homogenates easily, but it was highly efficient in detecting this virus after one embryo passage, depicting a general performance not statistically different from the VI test and showing a high reproducibility (Table 1). Furthermore, the Con A-S-ELISA must be considered as sensitive and specific as an S-ELISA applied for the detection of IBV antigen by Naqi et al (21), using a set of mAbs against the different IBV proteins, as capture antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs) have been developed and proved their efficacy, either for the detection of IBV antigen (1,12,15,19,21,34), or anti-IBV antibodies (2,3,4,8,16,22,29).…”
Section: Introduction I Nfectious Bronchitis Virus (Ibv) Is a Member Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, polyclonal or monoclonal anti-IBV capture antibodies have been adsorbed on the solid phase in sandwich-ELISA methods for trapping these viruses (12,19,21). Whole virus purification requires propagating large quantities of virus in eukaryotic systems and whereas the most reliable serodiagnostic reagents require highly purified antigen, purification of IBV with its highly glycosylated spike protein is difficult and expensive (22).…”
Section: Introduction I Nfectious Bronchitis Virus (Ibv) Is a Member Ofmentioning
Concanavalin A-Sandwich ELISA (Con A-S-ELISA) was developed for the detection of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) or chicken specific anti-viral antibodies. The antigen detection limit for the Con A-S-ELISA was 10 5,1 EID 50 /mL. Three homologous and four heterologous IBV strains were similarly detected. This assay was highly effective in detecting the virus after infected tissue homogenates were passed once in embryonated chicken eggs, showing a good agreement with virus isolation technique. The Con A-S-ELISA was also used to measure anti-IBV chicken antibodies and showed a high coefficient of correlation (r ؍ 0.85) and an agreement of k ؍ 0.80 with the commercially available Indirect-ELISA. The relative sensitivity and specificity between these two tests were, respectively, 92.86% and 95.65% with an accuracy of 93.39%. Thus, the Con A-S-ELISA proved to be able to detect alternatively homologous and heterologous IBV strains or specific chicken anti-IBV antibodies, using the Con A as capture reagent of this assay.
569
“…Immunoassays use IBV-specific monoclonal antibodies to detect the virus in direct or indirect fluorescent antibody and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay formats. Although more rapid and simpler than virus isolation, immunoassays tend to lack specificity and sensitivity to some extent and can not detect all strains of IBV (Karaca and Naqi, 1993;Karaca et al, 1992;Naqi et al, 1993). Molecular assays for the detection of IBV are used commonly because they provide highly specific and sensitive results and detect viral RNA directly from clinical samples or from virus isolated in a laboratory host system.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.