1993
DOI: 10.1080/03079459308418943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A monoclonal antibody‐based antigen capture enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for identification of infectious bronchitis virus serotypes

Abstract: SUMMARYAn antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) was developed for detection and identification of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) serotypes Arkansas, Connecticut, and Massachusetts using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to the S1 glycoprotein of the respective serotype. The assay (designed as a doubleantibody sandwich assay) gave the best results when the S1-specific MAb, antigen, and chicken serum were of the same serotype. However, when a group-specific (M glycoprotein-specific) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of these relatively high amounts of virus that are needed for detection by antigen ELISA, the sensitivity for detecting IBV antigen directly in chicken organs is low. Naqi et al (1993) failed to detect IBV by ELISA in tracheas of susceptible chickens after inoculation, while Nagano et al (1990) reported that the ELISA detected IBV for only 2 days, while virus was isolated for at least 7 days (the end of the experiment). Ignjatovic & Ashton (1996) could not detect antigen by ELISA after infection of chickens with a commercial vaccine, but did isolate the virus.…”
Section: Detection Of Ibv Antigenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these relatively high amounts of virus that are needed for detection by antigen ELISA, the sensitivity for detecting IBV antigen directly in chicken organs is low. Naqi et al (1993) failed to detect IBV by ELISA in tracheas of susceptible chickens after inoculation, while Nagano et al (1990) reported that the ELISA detected IBV for only 2 days, while virus was isolated for at least 7 days (the end of the experiment). Ignjatovic & Ashton (1996) could not detect antigen by ELISA after infection of chickens with a commercial vaccine, but did isolate the virus.…”
Section: Detection Of Ibv Antigenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con A-S-ELISA did not detect IBV antigens in trachea and lung homogenates easily, but it was highly efficient in detecting this virus after one embryo passage, depicting a general performance not statistically different from the VI test and showing a high reproducibility (Table 1). Furthermore, the Con A-S-ELISA must be considered as sensitive and specific as an S-ELISA applied for the detection of IBV antigen by Naqi et al (21), using a set of mAbs against the different IBV proteins, as capture antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs) have been developed and proved their efficacy, either for the detection of IBV antigen (1,12,15,19,21,34), or anti-IBV antibodies (2,3,4,8,16,22,29).…”
Section: Introduction I Nfectious Bronchitis Virus (Ibv) Is a Member Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immunoassays use IBV-specific monoclonal antibodies to detect the virus in direct or indirect fluorescent antibody and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay formats. Although more rapid and simpler than virus isolation, immunoassays tend to lack specificity and sensitivity to some extent and can not detect all strains of IBV (Karaca and Naqi, 1993;Karaca et al, 1992;Naqi et al, 1993). Molecular assays for the detection of IBV are used commonly because they provide highly specific and sensitive results and detect viral RNA directly from clinical samples or from virus isolated in a laboratory host system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%