1987
DOI: 10.2307/3576938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo Simulation of Auger Cascades

Abstract: The energy imparted to biological tissue after the decay of incorporated Auger emitters stems from two sources: (a) energy deposition by the Auger and Coster-Kronig electrons and (b) the charge potential which remains on the multiple ionized atom after the end of the cascade. For the numerical assessment of both the kinetic energy of the released electrons and the charge potential, a new and--for purposes of microdosimetry--precise method is presented. Based on relativistic Dirac-Fock calculations and a rigoro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I shows the reported energy E 0 , frequency distribution N(E 0 ), and their product Δ for Auger electrons energies between 5 and 18 eV from the nuclear decay of a single 125 I. 19,47 Below 5 eV, electrons mostly deposit their energies within DNA via vibrational excitation, which has negligible contribution to the total absorbed dose of DNA by ULEEs (i.e., 3%) compared with electronic excitation and ionization processes (i.e., 39% and 58%, respectively). 22 Furthermore, the reported threshold energy for the induction of DSB by ULEEs is 6-7 eV.…”
Section: A Absorbed Dose In Dna By Auger Electrons Of 5-18 Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table I shows the reported energy E 0 , frequency distribution N(E 0 ), and their product Δ for Auger electrons energies between 5 and 18 eV from the nuclear decay of a single 125 I. 19,47 Below 5 eV, electrons mostly deposit their energies within DNA via vibrational excitation, which has negligible contribution to the total absorbed dose of DNA by ULEEs (i.e., 3%) compared with electronic excitation and ionization processes (i.e., 39% and 58%, respectively). 22 Furthermore, the reported threshold energy for the induction of DSB by ULEEs is 6-7 eV.…”
Section: A Absorbed Dose In Dna By Auger Electrons Of 5-18 Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Inclusion of O-shell Coster-Kronig electrons in the nanodosimetry of 125 I, for example, increases the mean energy deposited in a cylinder of radius 1.15 nm by a factor of 3. 16,18,19 In addition, Auger electrons and x rays with energies higher than 20 eV produce ULEEs in each ionization interaction. Therefore, calculation of absorbed doses and quantification of subsequent molecular modifications by ULEE irradiation are essential steps to accurately estimate the biological effects of any type of radiation, particularly that of Auger electrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the spatial step ∆x depends on the value of the temporal step ∆t and therefore by accuracy and stability of the solutions of the diffusion equation (12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To access this formulation we have used the continuous finite element method [12], [13] and the method of centered differences [10]. Thus, the explicit method can replace the equation (11) by the following algebraic equation:…”
Section: Figure 2: Immediate Neighboring Of An Elementary Volume Insimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation