2004
DOI: 10.1079/phn2004616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo simulation to validate the EAR cut-point method for assessing the prevalence of nutrient inadequacy at the population level

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to validate the EAR cut-point method for assessing the prevalence of nutrient inadequacy at the population level. Design and subjects: Different methods for estimating the prevalence of inadequate intake were compared: the cut-off point method, with cut-off points at the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), 0.66 RDA, 0.50 RDA and the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR); the probability approach; and a Monte Carlo simulation. In total, 591 men and 674 women, aged 20 -55 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The daily energy and nutrient intakes of the study groups were compared using Student's t test, and differences were considered significant at P , 0?05. The proportion of children with inadequate dietary intake in each group was evaluated by estimating the percentage of individuals whose daily intake was less than the EAR (equivalent to 0?77 of the RDA) for the nutrient under consideration (5)(6)(7) . However, because there are no RDA for EFA, the lower limit of the AI (5) was used for these nutrients (linoleic acid and a-linolenic acid).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The daily energy and nutrient intakes of the study groups were compared using Student's t test, and differences were considered significant at P , 0?05. The proportion of children with inadequate dietary intake in each group was evaluated by estimating the percentage of individuals whose daily intake was less than the EAR (equivalent to 0?77 of the RDA) for the nutrient under consideration (5)(6)(7) . However, because there are no RDA for EFA, the lower limit of the AI (5) was used for these nutrients (linoleic acid and a-linolenic acid).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of individuals who under-report energy intake could overestimate by up to 17% the prevalence of inadequacy. 16 According to Poslusna et al (2009), 30% of underestimated iron, calcium or vitamin C intake may be related to under reporting. 21 On the other hand, the estimates of usual intake in the present study were based on appropriate statistical methods, adjusting distribution by intra-individual variability which removed extremes considered to be unlikely, for both over-and under-estimates of intake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) cut-point method is a well-known procedure for evaluating nutrient intakes of groups (16)(17)(18), and we adopted it to assess the proportion of the population at risk for inadequacy. To evaluate the proportion of the population at risk for nutrient excess (and calcium deficiency) we used the dietary goals for preventing life-style related diseases (DG) on the adjusted and unadjusted distributions of dietary intake data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%