1983
DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001670407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth and changes in spatial relations during secondary palatal development in human embryos and fetuses

Abstract: Staged human embryos and fetuses in the Carnegie Embryological Collection were morphometrically analyzed to show craniofacial dimensions and changes in spatial relations, and to identify patterns that would reflect normal developmental events during palatal formation. Normal embryos aged 7-8 weeks postconception (Streeter-O'Rahilly stages 19-23) and fetuses aged 9-10 weeks postconception, in eight groups with mean crown-rump (CR) lengths of 18-49 mm, were studied with cephalometric methods developed for histol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
1
14

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
65
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, restricted space would inhibit both mandibular growth and withdrawal of the tongue from between the shelves. There is some evidence that Meckel's cartilage actually bows out laterally before the tongue is released from between the shelves (presumably because the tongue is anchored to its anterior tip), with the anterior end of the cartilage "springing" forward and the sides narrowing after release of the tongue (e.g., Diewert, 1983). Delayed release could also account for the greater bigonial width observed in affected twins, as could reduced space for embryos in oligohydramnios.…”
Section: (B) Etiology and Pathogenesis Of Cpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this model, restricted space would inhibit both mandibular growth and withdrawal of the tongue from between the shelves. There is some evidence that Meckel's cartilage actually bows out laterally before the tongue is released from between the shelves (presumably because the tongue is anchored to its anterior tip), with the anterior end of the cartilage "springing" forward and the sides narrowing after release of the tongue (e.g., Diewert, 1983). Delayed release could also account for the greater bigonial width observed in affected twins, as could reduced space for embryos in oligohydramnios.…”
Section: (B) Etiology and Pathogenesis Of Cpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies focused on craniofacial growth (e.g., Diewert, 1983) and embryo movements (e.g., Humphrey, 1969;Walker, 1969) related to removal of the tongue from between the shelves. Other studies focused on the shelf "force" involved in shelf elevation, examining the possible involvement of various intercellular substances (e.g., Brinkley and Morris-Wiman, 1984), neurotransmitters, and other factors including ATP levels (Bulleit and Zimmerman, 1986).…”
Section: (D) Development Of the Secondary Palatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of the cranial base appears to be established during fetal development (Ford, 1956;Diewert, 1983;Burdi et al, 1988), and it remains relatively stable during postnatal growth (Lewis and Roche, 1977;Lestrel and Roche, 1986). A prominent feature of this early growth is a progressive flattening of the cranial base during late prenatal development (Ford, 1956;Burdi, 1969;Diewert, 1983Diewert, , 1985.…”
Section: Cranial Base In Class III Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prominent feature of this early growth is a progressive flattening of the cranial base during late prenatal development (Ford, 1956;Burdi, 1969;Diewert, 1983Diewert, , 1985. Although some reports indicate that a closing of the cranial base angle occurs postnatally (George, 1978;Lang, 1983), morphological instability of nasion casts some doubt on these results (Kerr, 1978).…”
Section: Cranial Base In Class III Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modifications of the cranial base during growth 8,18,21,32,33 , the ethnic differences, evolutionary changes between primates and homo sapiens, the relationship with encephalization, upright stature or speech are some subjects that are largely controversial. Further the published results are most often contradictory.…”
Section: -3 -Growth Of the Base Of The Craniummentioning
confidence: 99%