2014
DOI: 10.4321/s0004-05922014000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A morphometric study of sheep reared in north-east Algerian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficients of variation calculated on all the measurements ranged from 2.33 to 7.37%. These values were lower than those reported by Dekhili (2014) and Harkat et al (2015). The highest variation was observed for WW (7.37%), which could be important for selection and improvement.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The coefficients of variation calculated on all the measurements ranged from 2.33 to 7.37%. These values were lower than those reported by Dekhili (2014) and Harkat et al (2015). The highest variation was observed for WW (7.37%), which could be important for selection and improvement.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…A breed characterization based on morphometric traits was not accurate for characterizing Arabian goats in the northern ecotype (40.30%) of Algeria [ 5 ], Burkina Faso goats in the Sudan area (6.00%) [ 9 ], and Algerian sheep in the southern (10.00%) and central (14.75%) areas of Algeria [ 11 ]. However, the D 2 value between Kacang goats in the lowland and the highland regions based on body measurements was 0.36 ( Table 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported that the body measurements could be used to characterize 70%-100% of Ripollesa sheep at nine different populations (Esquivelzeta et al, 2011); 54.18%-74.59% of Algerian sheep at three different populations (Dekhili, 2014) and 76.27%-92.80% of Djallonke ewes at three different populations (N'Goran et al, 2019). Moreover, the body measurements were used by Asamoah-Boaheng & Sam (2016), reporting that 65.20% of Djallonke sheep, 88.90% of Sahel sheep, and 79.30% of Djallonke × Sahel sheep can be characterized with body measurements.…”
Section: Canonical Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In small-ruminant animals, morphometric characterization can be performed with body measurements and body indices (Esquivelzeta et al, 2011;Ouchene-Khelifi et al, 2018;Putra & Ilham, 2019;Markovic et al, 2019). Moreover, previous studies have classified the small-ruminant animals from different populations based on their morphometrics (Zaitoun et al, 2005;Traore et al, 2008;Nafti et al, 2014;Dekhili et al, 2014;Gatew et al, 2015;Hosseini et al, 2016;Birhanie et al, 2019;Jarquin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%