A Mote in Andromeda's Disk: A Misidentified Periodic AGN behind M31

Abstract

We identify an object previously thought to be a star in the disk of M31, J0045+41, as a background z ≈ 0.215 AGN seen through a low-absorption region of M31. We present moderate resolution spectroscopy of J0045+41 obtained using GMOS at Gemini-North. The spectrum contains features attributable to the host galaxy. We model the spectrum to estimate the AGN contribution, from which we estimate the luminosity and virial mass of the central engine. Residuals to our fit reveal a blue-shifted component to the broad Hα and Hβ at a relative velocity of ∼ 4800 km s −1 . We also detect Na I absorption in the Milky Way restframe. We search for evidence of periodicity using g-band photometry from the Palomar Transient Factory and find evidence for multiple periodicities ranging from ∼ 80 − 350 days. Two of the detected periods are in a 1:4 ratio, which is identical to the predictions of hydrodynamical simulations of binary supermassive black hole systems. If these signals arise due to such a system, J0045+41 is well within the gravitational wave regime. We calculate the time until inspiral due to gravitational radiation, assuming reasonable values of the mass ratio of the two black holes. We discuss the implications of our findings and forthcoming work to identify other such interlopers in the light of upcoming photometric surveys such as the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) or the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) projects.

Young Accreting Compact Objects in M31: The Combined Power of NuSTAR, Chandra, and Hubble

“…This source was investigated in detail by Dorn-Wallenstein et al (2017), who found that it has a spectroscopic redshift, which agrees with our classification as a background galaxy. This source highlights the importance of incorporating data at optical wavelengths to remove background AGN contamination.…”

The quest for dual and binary supermassive black holes: A multi-messenger view

“…Additional candidates have emerged from the analysis of historical long-baseline light curves of bright AGN (Li et al, 2016;Bon et al, 2016) and the analysis of blazar light curves from the Fermi gamma-ray telescope (Sandrinelli et al, 2016(Sandrinelli et al, , 2018a. Furthermore, Dorn-Wallenstein et al (2017) claimed the detection of a periodic AGN in PTF, which was subsequently disputed by Barth and Stern (2018), who highlight the importance of interpreting correctly the null hypothesis simulation tests and and performing carefully the calculation of the false alarm probability.…”

Population Estimates for Electromagnetically Distinguishable Supermassive Binary Black Holes

“…As a result, quasi-periodic variations on timescales ∼ 1/3 the duration of the monitoring almost always appear in lightcurves with this character (Press 1978); because their timescale is a function of an experimental parameter, these quasi-periodicities are spurious, and disappear (to be replaced by longer-term apparent quasi-periodicities) when the data are extended (e.g., as reported by Liu et al (2018)). Statistical analyses based on damped random walk (DRW) models (e.g., Graham et al (2015b); Liu et al (2015); Charisi et al (2016); Dorn-Wallenstein et al (2017)) fail to solve this problem because the DRW model assumes that the fluctuation power spectrum is flat at sufficiently low frequencies. Although this fluctuation power flattening must eventually happen for any finite system, the timescale at which it does is only rarely reached in observed systems.…”