1993
DOI: 10.1177/039139889301601107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mouse Model of Implant-Associated Infection

Abstract: Infections of implanted devices are of increasing frequency and importance, representing a significant limitation of many therapeutic modalities. There are puzzling features of implant-associated infection including the changes in microbial flora, the tendency to chronicity and impaired responses to conservative modes of treatment. The concept of the bacterial biofilm as a shielding mechanism generated by bacteria adherent to artificial surfaces has recently been proposed as an explanation for these features. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been few studies in which the foreign body was inoculated before implantation 17,32–35 . Longer incubation periods of 24–72 h allow for extensive bacterial biofilm formation on the surface of foreign body before implantation, which is again not in harmony with the clinical perioperative infection 32–34 . Shorter incubation periods seems to result in a more reliable and reproducible FBI model 17,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been few studies in which the foreign body was inoculated before implantation 17,32–35 . Longer incubation periods of 24–72 h allow for extensive bacterial biofilm formation on the surface of foreign body before implantation, which is again not in harmony with the clinical perioperative infection 32–34 . Shorter incubation periods seems to result in a more reliable and reproducible FBI model 17,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models consist of direct inoculations of prosthetic materials with bacteria at the time of surgery 36,37 . However, this increased the variability of the data and resulted in unpredictable infection rates in previous studies with small‐animal models 17,34 . Some investigators have claimed successful results using infection models with simultaneous topical bacterial inoculation along with the foreign body implantation in small animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the principle of internal fixation is to minimise and isolate contact of the implant, and its surface must allow adherence of the soft tissue to avoid a fluid-filled dead space as is often seen around conventional electropolished steel implants. 99 The local resistance to infection was studied experimentally using human pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus in simulated internal fixation in the tibia of the rabbit. The study observed the effect of the design, material and application of the implant in relation to the number of colonyforming units required to produce an infection.…”
Section: 93mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recentemente, tem sido elaborado o conceito de que a microflora bacteriana em próteses implantadas possui a princí-pio um mecanismo "protetor" gerado por bactérias que aderem às superfícies artificiais, o que seria capaz de explicar por outro lado por que esse tipo de infecção vem crescendo em freqüência e importância, além das alterações na flora microbiana e a tendência à cronicidade (15) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified