2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01208-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-approach rockfall hazard assessment on a weathered granite natural rock slope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Shortly after the fire, a few new fragmented boulders were identified at the lower part of the slope (Figure 9b). A detailed study, briefly reported in what follows, has been published elsewhere [115].…”
Section: Galiciamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly after the fire, a few new fragmented boulders were identified at the lower part of the slope (Figure 9b). A detailed study, briefly reported in what follows, has been published elsewhere [115].…”
Section: Galiciamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each cliff segment, we conducted a kinematic analysis with Dips to obtain the probabilities for planar sliding, wedge sliding, and toppling using the cliff segments' average dip and dip directions and the identified joint sets at the cliffs. The probability of failure can be used as an indication of rockfall susceptibility at a given location, and similar approaches have been used by other authors (e.g., Matasci et al 2018;Pérez-Rey et al 2019). We analysed the number of joint sets that form critical intersections and identified critical sets on each cliff segment that can contribute to failures.…”
Section: Analysis Of Rock Mass Discontinuities and Rockfall Release Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto incluyó un estudio geotécnico clásico, datos meteorológicos y sísmicos y se obtuvo una nube de puntos muy detallada de toda la zona mediante la combinación de diferentes técnicas de detección remota (fotogrametría de dron y LiDAR). Además, a partir de la nube de puntos se realizó un análisis geoestructural semiautomático (Riquelme et al, 2014) que permitió obtener el tamaño de bloque medio de granito en la ladera, de en torno a 0.9 m 3 (Pérez-Rey et al, 2019a). Una vez que se disponía de dicha información, se realizó un reconocimiento de campo detallado donde se identificaron todos los bloques, conjuntos de bloques y zonas potencialmente inestables, así como la presencia de bloques caídos en el pasado.…”
Section: Ejemplounclassified