Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/p18-1122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Axis Annotation Scheme for Event Temporal Relations

Abstract: Existing temporal relation (TempRel) annotation schemes often have low interannotator agreements (IAA) even between experts, suggesting that the current annotation task needs a better definition. This paper proposes a new multi-axis modeling to better capture the temporal structure of events. In addition, we identify that event end-points are a major source of confusion in annotation, so we also propose to annotate TempRels based on start-points only. A pilot expert annotation effort using the proposed scheme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
163
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following that, we provide a benchmark evaluation in Sec. 3 on the TempEval3 and the MATRES datasets (UzZaman et al, 2013;Ning et al, 2018c). Finally, we point out directions for future work and conclude this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following that, we provide a benchmark evaluation in Sec. 3 on the TempEval3 and the MATRES datasets (UzZaman et al, 2013;Ning et al, 2018c). Finally, we point out directions for future work and conclude this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Specifically, CogCompTime only considers those main-axis events, so event extraction is simply a binary classification problem (i.e., whether or not a token is a main-axis event or not). As defined by the MATRES annotation scheme (Ning et al, 2018c), main-axis events are those events that form the primary timeline of a story and approximately 60%-70% of the verbs are on the main-axis in MATRES. We extract lemmas and POS tags within a fixed window, SRL, and prepositional phrase head, and train a sparse averaged perceptron for event extraction.…”
Section: Event Extraction Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of "events" commonsense, Rashkin et al (2018) investigated the intent and reaction of participants of an event, and Zellers et al (2018) best of our knowledge, no earlier work has focused on temporal commonsense, although it is critical for event understanding. For instance, Ning et al (2018c) argues that resolving ambiguous and implicit mentions of event durations in text (a specific kind of temporal commonsense) is necessary to construct the timeline of a story.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid missing relations, annotators are required to exhaustively label every pair of events in a document (i.e., the complete annotation scheme), so it is necessary to study ESPA in this context. Here we adopt the MATRES dataset (Ning et al, 2018b) for its better inter-annotator agreement and relatively large size.…”
Section: Temporal Relation Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%