2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11030-021-10243-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-conformational virtual screening approach based on machine learning targeting PI3Kγ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the overall performance of docking enrichment, the docking scores of the dataset were used to generate a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) value was determined. [ 53 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to evaluate the overall performance of docking enrichment, the docking scores of the dataset were used to generate a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) value was determined. [ 53 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular Docking Setup: Four mainstream molecular docking programs were employed in this study: two commercial software programs, namely CDOCKER from Discovery Studio 2017 (DS2017) and Glide from Schrödinger (version 2018); two academic software programs, namely AutoDock Vina (version 1.2.5) and LeDock. [53] During docking, the positions of all docking pockets were set to the location where the eutectic ligand was situated. Moreover, considering the practical virtual screening process, semi-flexible docking was used for each docking program (rigid for the receptor and flexible for the ligand).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previous studies have demonstrated that eight complexes would be satisfactory to build the multiple structure-based VS model, [22,24,26,28,29] thus, 24 ligand-JAK3 binding complexes were divided into eight categories according to structural characteristics using the k-means algorithm. [30,31] Finally, the protein whose RMSD (root-mean-square deviation) value was closest to the centroid within the same category was selected as the representative structure.…”
Section: Selection Of Representative Jak3 Conformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] In our previous works, several SBVS models based on multiple protein structures have been established to identify kinase selective inhibitors and some compounds with potent bioactivities were successfully screened out. All these results fully reveal the reliability and practicability of the ensemble-based VS. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Therefore, in this present study, an in silico ensemble strategy that combines molecular docking, pharmacophore, and naïve Bayesian classification (NBC) using multiple JAK3-inhibitor complexes was developed for virtual screening against JAK3 protein (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%