2016
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2016.2527020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Functional Penta-Needle Thermo-Dielectric Sensor for Porous Media Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible alternative is to use a thermo‐FDR (Sheng et al, ), because capacitance or impedance sensors (FDR) allow more flexibility in electrode configuration with reduced measurement complexity compared to TDR, in addition to lower costs of the electronics system and minimal postprocessing (Sheng et al, ; Xu et al, ; Zent et al, , ). Sheng et al () coupled an electromagnetic sensor to determine water content with a penta‐needle thermo‐FDR, which demonstrated a significant improvement in soil water content determination (with RMSE = 0.012 cm 3 /cm 3 compared to RMSE = 0.042 cm 3 /cm 3 of the HP methods). It should be noted the proper frequency range must be used to obtain accurate soil water determination as well as to reduce effects of temperature and salinity, but the use of FDR has difficulty in soils with high clay content.…”
Section: Limitations and Perspectives Of The Hp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible alternative is to use a thermo‐FDR (Sheng et al, ), because capacitance or impedance sensors (FDR) allow more flexibility in electrode configuration with reduced measurement complexity compared to TDR, in addition to lower costs of the electronics system and minimal postprocessing (Sheng et al, ; Xu et al, ; Zent et al, , ). Sheng et al () coupled an electromagnetic sensor to determine water content with a penta‐needle thermo‐FDR, which demonstrated a significant improvement in soil water content determination (with RMSE = 0.012 cm 3 /cm 3 compared to RMSE = 0.042 cm 3 /cm 3 of the HP methods). It should be noted the proper frequency range must be used to obtain accurate soil water determination as well as to reduce effects of temperature and salinity, but the use of FDR has difficulty in soils with high clay content.…”
Section: Limitations and Perspectives Of The Hp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent evaluations in the field (Heitman, Xiao, Horton, & Sauer, 2008b;Wang, Fan, & Wang, 2015;Xiao, Heitman, Sauer, Ren, & Horton, 2014;Xiao, Horton, Sauer, Heitman, & Ren, 2011), laboratory (Deol, Heitman, Amoozegar, Ren, & Horton, 2012), and by numerical modeling (Sakai, Jones, & Tuller, 2011) have shown that the SHB approach can provide in situ subsurface evaporation estimates at relatively short time steps (e.g., sub-daily) and that the estimates compare favorably with independent estimates obtained through lysimetry and micrometeorological techniques. Recent advances in heat-pulse sensor design (Sheng, Rumana, Sakai, Silfa, & Jones, 2016;Zhang, Lu, Heitman, Horton, & Ren, 2012) and improvements in SHB calculations (Deol, Heitman, Amoozegar, Ren, & Horton, 2014;Xiao et al, 2014) have extended the measurement zone to capture subsurface soil water evaporation from its inception (i.e., once evaporation occurs within the soil rather than at the surface). In the following, we describe the principle of measurement, discuss the accuracy and limitations for implementation, and provide an example dataset for calculations.…”
Section: Rationale For General Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%