2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-layer control hierarchy for heavy duty vehicles with off-line dual stage dynamic programming optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All considered techniques are non-causal, except the ECMS-based one, which uses current and past information only. Both DP [13][14][15][16][17] and PMP [18,19] techniques are well established and have been extensively presented in the literature for hybrid powertrain optimization, and are here therefore used to evaluate the performance of the newly proposed FADP and ECMS-based approaches. In the following, a brief overview on optimal control problem formulation is given, followed by the introduction of the bases of all the considered methods (both conventional and novel) and the analysis of their performance for hybrid powertrain optimization.…”
Section: Supervisory Control Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All considered techniques are non-causal, except the ECMS-based one, which uses current and past information only. Both DP [13][14][15][16][17] and PMP [18,19] techniques are well established and have been extensively presented in the literature for hybrid powertrain optimization, and are here therefore used to evaluate the performance of the newly proposed FADP and ECMS-based approaches. In the following, a brief overview on optimal control problem formulation is given, followed by the introduction of the bases of all the considered methods (both conventional and novel) and the analysis of their performance for hybrid powertrain optimization.…”
Section: Supervisory Control Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further detail on Dynamic Programming can be found in [21,22], whereas its application to the hybrid vehicle problem can be found, e.g., in [2,13,[15][16][17][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Dynamic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the upper level uses real-time traffic flow velocity to compute a global state of charge trajectory, and the lower level applies a MPC algorithm which takes advantage of short-term velocity prediction. To reduce the computational costs and time for on-board controller of the HDV, [25]- [27] decouple the whole optimization into the velocity profile and shifting schedule calculation, in which an off-line algorithm in the higher layer (can be deployed in cloud) is designed to optimize the vehicle velocity profile, while the on-line powertrain control is implemented in the lower layer based on the reference velocity profile. All these computation-intensive calculations can also be performed in the cloud [11] to generate the optimal speed profile which is provided as the reference for the driver via HMI.…”
Section: A Vehicle Eco-drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the traffic information, an energy management strategy considering velocity optimization was proposed and near-optimality was achieved through updating the co-state values. 19 Donatantonio et al 20 proposed a comprehensive control strategy for a heavy-duty vehicle. The upper controller obtained the optimal velocity trajectory as well as the shift schedule utilizing the road information, which was based on dual step dynamic programming, the lower controller computed the control input for the powertrain considering the physical constraints of the engine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%