2014
DOI: 10.5897/ijbc2013.0564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-method approach for the inventory of the adult population of a critically endangered crocodilian, the Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) at Dhikala, Corbett Tiger Reserve incorporating direct counts and trail cameras

Abstract: The Corbett Tiger Reserve (CTR), a very highly rated protected area in the State of Uttarakhand, India, is home to the third largest breeding population of adult gharial globally. It contributes 20% to the estimated global population of 200 -250 adults of the taxon and it is also the only known population of the taxon which lives predominantly in a lake-like environment. CTR was surveyed for gharial in 2008 which was the first systematic survey with regard to the taxon since 1974 and the meta-population here w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, encounter rates were 0.52 (Rajbhandari & Acharya, 2013) and 0.6 in the Narayani River (Rajbhandari & Acharya, 2015), and 0.5 (Bhatta, 2009) and 0.7 in the Rapti River (Rajbhandari & Acharya, 2013) in CNP. Encounter rates were 1.11 (Katdare et al, 2011) and 2.04 (Hussain, 2009) in the Chambal River and 4.01 in the Dhikala River (Chowfin & Leslie, 2014) in India. Although all of these studies were daytime surveys similar to ours, direct comparisons of encounter rates are not justified because these populations probably differed with respect to population dynamics or management regimes, and were conducted in different years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, encounter rates were 0.52 (Rajbhandari & Acharya, 2013) and 0.6 in the Narayani River (Rajbhandari & Acharya, 2015), and 0.5 (Bhatta, 2009) and 0.7 in the Rapti River (Rajbhandari & Acharya, 2013) in CNP. Encounter rates were 1.11 (Katdare et al, 2011) and 2.04 (Hussain, 2009) in the Chambal River and 4.01 in the Dhikala River (Chowfin & Leslie, 2014) in India. Although all of these studies were daytime surveys similar to ours, direct comparisons of encounter rates are not justified because these populations probably differed with respect to population dynamics or management regimes, and were conducted in different years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(2018) reported a relatively higher number of Gharials ( n = 33) in BNP compared to our study, possibly due to the use of a different survey method, namely the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). While majority of Gharial studies (including this) (Bashyal et al., 2021; Chowfin & Leslie, 2014; Neupane et al., 2020; Nishan et al., 2023; Rajbhandari & Acharya, 2015; Singh & Rao, 2017) in multiple sites in India and Nepal employed visual encounter surveys (Crump et al., 1994) while sailing random transects along riverine habitat to estimate the Gharial population size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%