2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective optimization framework for aerosol jet customized line width printing via small data set and prediction uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, many researchers explored the underlying causal aerodynamic interactions that led to trends in line morphology using computational fluid dynamic models and achieved a better understanding of aerosol droplet generation, transportation, and impaction [ 104 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 ]. Additionally, data-driven process modeling can eliminate the drifting and stochastic nature of the print system and efficiently determine the optimal operating process window, which is attractive for controlling the line morphology [ 117 , 118 , 119 ].…”
Section: Multi-materials 3d Printing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, many researchers explored the underlying causal aerodynamic interactions that led to trends in line morphology using computational fluid dynamic models and achieved a better understanding of aerosol droplet generation, transportation, and impaction [ 104 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 ]. Additionally, data-driven process modeling can eliminate the drifting and stochastic nature of the print system and efficiently determine the optimal operating process window, which is attractive for controlling the line morphology [ 117 , 118 , 119 ].…”
Section: Multi-materials 3d Printing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chang 218 and Wang et al 96 developed statistical models to investigate the influence of the main control parameters on the printed line features, and the effectiveness of the proposed models was validated by ANOVA and additional experiments. On the basis of the Gaussian process regression (GPR), Zhang et al 219 investigated the inherent contradictions between line thickness, line edge roughness and a customized line width based on the integration of derived GPR models and NSGA-III. And the optimal process parameters for a specified line width were determined under the dual conflicting objectives of maximizing line thickness and minimizing line edge roughness, and the objective of customizing line width.…”
Section: Ink Printabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are strategies to reduce the number of runs, such as fractional factorial, these may result in reduced accuracy [42,43].…”
Section: Building Empirical Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And GPR has been gaining popularity in machine learning due to its superiority for out of sample test performance, and uncertainty characterization and management [14,48,49]. Further, GPR provides predictive variance which allows modelling of predictive uncertainty which can be used for further optimization and decision making [13,43]. The following section discuss in detail the implementation of GPR in the proposed framework.…”
Section: Surrogate Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%