2014 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cloudcom.2014.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-resource Selection Scheme for Virtual Machine Consolidation in Cloud Data Centers

Abstract: Resources used in a cloud data center could be spread across a large number of servers that are not fully utilized. This situation results in significant operational costs which are directly related to the power consumption of active servers. Virtual machine migration enables reducing the number of active servers by consolidating the load on a limited amount of nodes. Several schemes have actually been proposed to consolidate virtual machines on the minimum number of physical servers in order to reduce power c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, VMCUP-M consolidates VMs according to the usage of multiple resources and a tunable horizon to predict future utilization. This article extends our previous work [18,19] as follows. We first present an efficient multiple usage prediction (MUP) approach to estimate the long-term utilization of each resource type based on the local history of the considered servers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In particular, VMCUP-M consolidates VMs according to the usage of multiple resources and a tunable horizon to predict future utilization. This article extends our previous work [18,19] as follows. We first present an efficient multiple usage prediction (MUP) approach to estimate the long-term utilization of each resource type based on the local history of the considered servers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Since this approach does not consider inter-VM network communication patterns, such placement decisions can eventually result in locating VMs with high mutual network traffic in long distant servers, such as servers locating across the network edges. Several other VM placement works focusing on non-network objectives can be found in (Wu and Ishikawa, 2015), (Farahnakian et al, 2015), (Nguyen et al, 2014), (Corradi et al, 2014), and (Alboaneen et al, 2014). With a network-focused analysis, it can be concluded that research works such as the above ones considered single-tier applications and VM clusters without consideration of mutual network communication within the application components or VMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consolidation of VMs was considered in our earlier work [14] for reallocating the VMs to already-active servers. A multi-resource selection (MRS) scheme was proposed based on the current resource utilization and used as allocation criteria when determining a server is overloaded and underutilized.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient VM consolidation algorithm was also proposed for spreading the load across different types of resources while consolidating VMs. With respect to [14], we predict the short-term future resource utilization based on past statistics of the considered servers. We use the current and predicted usage metrics as a reliable characterization of overloaded and underloaded servers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation