2023
DOI: 10.3390/e25030464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Scale Temporal Convolutional Network with Attention Mechanism for Force Level Classification during Motor Imagery of Unilateral Upper-Limb Movements

Abstract: In motor imagery (MI) brain–computer interface (BCI) research, some researchers have designed MI paradigms of force under a unilateral upper-limb static state. It is difficult to apply these paradigms to the dynamic force interaction process between the robot and the patient in a brain-controlled rehabilitation robot system, which needs to induce thinking states of the patient’s demand for assistance. Therefore, in our research, according to the movement of wiping the table in human daily life, we designed a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, a high multi-classification accuracy of 96.42% has been achieved by using EEG-KMI data from the PM, DLPFC, and near IPL areas. This result supports the hypothesis that KMI-BCI 4-multilevel detection can be achieved without necessarily including EEG data from the M1 area, as in [58,61,64], and is consistent with the results of [23] where it was found high accuracy of binary classification for KMI and VMI using PM, DLPFC, IPL, and SMA; however, they used high-density EEG (64 electrodes). This suggests a novel venue for research, mainly using lowres and low-cost EEG headsets, such as the Emotiv used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, a high multi-classification accuracy of 96.42% has been achieved by using EEG-KMI data from the PM, DLPFC, and near IPL areas. This result supports the hypothesis that KMI-BCI 4-multilevel detection can be achieved without necessarily including EEG data from the M1 area, as in [58,61,64], and is consistent with the results of [23] where it was found high accuracy of binary classification for KMI and VMI using PM, DLPFC, IPL, and SMA; however, they used high-density EEG (64 electrodes). This suggests a novel venue for research, mainly using lowres and low-cost EEG headsets, such as the Emotiv used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar works that detect KMI levels made their analysis from motor cortex EEG signals, thus is, focusing on the information provided by primary motor cortex (M1) electrodes C3, C4, and even Cz [60][61][62][63][64], their classification accuracy reached 70.9%, 78.3%, 53%-55%, 81.4%, and 86.4%, respectively. Table 4 presents, for comparison purposes, previous similar works that have classified multi-level KMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach is a common choice for assessing the effectiveness of MI involving hand movements in healthy [25], [55] and stroke patients [56]. The C3/C4 channels were used to evaluate MI involving more complex upper limb tasks, such as wiping a table [57] and elbow rotation, among others [22]. We also focused our analysis on C3/C4, which are the most representative channels for the primary motor areas and commonly used for the upper limb rehabilitation assessment.…”
Section: Data Processing and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%