2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-vessel quay crane assignment and scheduling problem: Formulation and heuristic solution approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precedence and simultaneity constraints are also not considered. Note that the results reported in (Fu, 2014) in Table 3 for instance do not make sense. The GAMS results which presumably are exact, cannot possibly be worse that those returned by GA for most of the problem instances considered.…”
Section: The Combined Quay Crane Assignment and Quay Crane Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Precedence and simultaneity constraints are also not considered. Note that the results reported in (Fu, 2014) in Table 3 for instance do not make sense. The GAMS results which presumably are exact, cannot possibly be worse that those returned by GA for most of the problem instances considered.…”
Section: The Combined Quay Crane Assignment and Quay Crane Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Few attempts have been made at combining QCAP and QCSP, as in (Diabat, 2014;Fu, 2014). This could possibly be due to the complexity of the mathematical formulation and especially its computational demands.…”
Section: The Quay Crane Scheduling Problem (Qcsp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A model is developed for the quay crane assignment and scheduling problem with the aim of minimizing the handling makespan of ships [16]. Aiming to minimize the makespan of container terminals, Fu et al [17] analyzed the integrated quay crane assignment and scheduling problem with respect to the travels of cranes from one ship to another ship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%