2013
DOI: 10.5120/11807-7457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicriteria Decision Making Environment for Engineering Design and Production Decision-Making

Abstract: A novel environment for optimization, analytics and decision support in general engineering design problems is introduced. The utilized methodology is based on reactive search optimization (RSO) procedure and its recently implemented visualization software packages. The new set of powerful integrated data mining, modeling, visualiztion and learning tools via a handy procedure stretches beyond a decisionmaking task and attempts to discover new optimal designs relating to decision variables and objectives, so th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework, [24] has implemented RSO multi-objective optimization software for selecting the sustainable textiles composites materials. Yet, [25] proposed a hybrid Group Multi-criteria Decision Making (GMCDM) model integrating the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) and the PROMETHEE methods to choose the best industrial performance indicators of single braking disc.…”
Section: Mcdm In Selection Sustainable Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, [24] has implemented RSO multi-objective optimization software for selecting the sustainable textiles composites materials. Yet, [25] proposed a hybrid Group Multi-criteria Decision Making (GMCDM) model integrating the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) and the PROMETHEE methods to choose the best industrial performance indicators of single braking disc.…”
Section: Mcdm In Selection Sustainable Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44]…”
Section: Uncited Referencesunclassified
“…For resource allocation in distributed scheduling, Xu et al [5] present a nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-based multi-objective method (NSGA-II) [10]. They aimed at minimizing the time and cost in load balancing using resources to achieve Pareto optimal front.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%