2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005wr004653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multimodel ensemble forecast framework: Application to spring seasonal flows in the Gunnison River Basin

Abstract: [1] We propose a multimodel ensemble forecast framework for streamflow forecasts at multiple locations that incorporates large-scale climate information. It has four broad steps: (1) Principal component analysis is performed on the spatial streamflows to identify the dominant modes of variability. (2) Potential predictors of the dominant streamflow modes are identified from several large-scale climate features and snow water equivalent information. (3) Objective criterion is used to select a suite of candidate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
126
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several measures and ways to evaluate a forecast, but given the short dataset single point cross-validated R 2 is acceptable (e.g., Grantz et al, 2005;Regonda et al, 2006). In this analysis, the observations for a year are dropped and the model is fitted using the remaining observations.…”
Section: Forecast Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several measures and ways to evaluate a forecast, but given the short dataset single point cross-validated R 2 is acceptable (e.g., Grantz et al, 2005;Regonda et al, 2006). In this analysis, the observations for a year are dropped and the model is fitted using the remaining observations.…”
Section: Forecast Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several statistical approaches can be found in the literature, encompassing different degrees of complexity (e.g., Garen, 1992;Piechota et al, 1998;Grantz et al, 2005;Tootle et al, 2007;Pagano et al, 2009;Moradkhani and Meier, 2010). Other studies have tested multi-model combination techniques for purely statistical seasonal forecasts, using objective performance criteria (e.g., Regonda et al, 2006), both performance and predictor state information (Devineni et al, 2008), and Bayesian model averaging (e.g., Mendoza et al, 2014), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the utility of the bestglm technique in the multiple linear regression scenario based on selective information criteria was skillfully used to forecast spring seasonal streamflow at the upstream of Bhakra Dam over the Satluj River at different lead times. We compared the forecasts to PCR and PLSR, which were more widely used for the central and southern Asian rivers (Schar et al, 2004;Tippet et al, 2004;Barlow and Tippet, 2008) and also in the US (Regonda et al, 2006). We find that overall, the proposed method is equally skillful to (and actually more skillful than) existing operational models while tending to better predict seasonal streamflow 1-4 months in advance.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The K-NN local polynomials and the local weighted polynomial (LOC-FIT) approaches are very similar. Some of these methods were also used in conjunction with the multimodel ensemble forecasting framework that helps in determining the probability of exceedances of various thresholds useful for the water resource management (Regonda et al, 2006;Bracken et al, 2010). Existing studies also show that multimodel ensemble forecasts tend to perform much better than a singlemodel forecast, particularly in short-term and seasonal climate forecast (Krishnamurti et al, 1999(Krishnamurti et al, , 2000Rajagopalan et al, 2002;Hagedorn et al, 2005;Wood and Lettenmaier, 2006;Singla et al, 2012).…”
Section: Pal Et Al: Predictability Of Western Himalayan River Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%