2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3047861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiple Layer U-Net, Un-Net, for Liver and Liver Tumor Segmentation in CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a U-Net variation, attention mechanism, and Skip Connections, AHCNet demonstrated global Dice values of 0.734 for tumor segmentation [27]. Un-Net, which uses an n-fold architecture, has a Dice score of 0.7369 for tumor segmentation [28]. In a study of Ayalew, the Dice score was 0.63 ± 0.02 if the tumors were directly segmented from abdominal CT images, and 0.74 ± 0.02 if tumor segmentation was executed after liver segmentation [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a U-Net variation, attention mechanism, and Skip Connections, AHCNet demonstrated global Dice values of 0.734 for tumor segmentation [27]. Un-Net, which uses an n-fold architecture, has a Dice score of 0.7369 for tumor segmentation [28]. In a study of Ayalew, the Dice score was 0.63 ± 0.02 if the tumors were directly segmented from abdominal CT images, and 0.74 ± 0.02 if tumor segmentation was executed after liver segmentation [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, by looking into the recent work for liver tumors, S.-T. Tran et al [38] proposed an improved U-NET based method by employing the architecture of dense and dilated convolution and achieved a very significant improvement regarding the Dice score. Similarly, H. Seo et al [39] also proposed an improved U-NET that was based on segmenting both the liver and tumors.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F irst, we experiment with two approaches trained on fully annotated 3D data. Fully Supervised (FS)-Same Domain refers to the scenario where the training and testing data come from the same benchmark dataset Results from both state-of-the-art methods [2,10,11,23] and 3D UNets trained by us are reported. On the other hand, FS-Different Domain aims to evaluate the generalizability of FS approaches when training and testing data come from different domains.…”
Section: Baseline Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%