2017
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20170037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multivariate Model for Prediction of Obstructive Coronary Disease in Patients with Acute Chest Pain: Development and Validation

Abstract: BackgroundCurrently, there is no validated multivariate model to predict probability of obstructive coronary disease in patients with acute chest pain.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a multivariate model to predict coronary artery disease (CAD) based on variables assessed at admission to the coronary care unit (CCU) due to acute chest pain.MethodsA total of 470 patients were studied, 370 utilized as the derivation sample and the subsequent 100 patients as the validation sample. As the reference standard, angi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Predicting models may better estimate the pretest probability for coronary artery disease in individuals with acute chest discomfort during SVT and would help to conduct these scenarios more appropriately. 23 Although we claim that chest pain favors a coronary disease work up bias, we lack any objective data to support it and we recognize that the cognitive bias hypothesis is speculative and should be evaluated in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“… 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Predicting models may better estimate the pretest probability for coronary artery disease in individuals with acute chest discomfort during SVT and would help to conduct these scenarios more appropriately. 23 Although we claim that chest pain favors a coronary disease work up bias, we lack any objective data to support it and we recognize that the cognitive bias hypothesis is speculative and should be evaluated in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…4 Nesse processo, a probabilidade de DAC obstrutiva deve conduzir a tomada de decisão médica. 5 No presente estudo, utilizamos dados de um registro prospectivo de dor torácica para construir um modelo de machine learning para predizer doença coronariana obstrutiva. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar se um algoritmo de inteligência artificial é um melhor preditor que a regressão logística em um conjunto tradicional de dados epidemiológicos simples, considerando tanto propriedades discriminatórias como de calibração.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In the present study, we utilized data from a prospective registry of chest pain 5 to build a machine learning model to predict obstructive coronary disease. We aimed to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence algorithm is a better predictor than logistic regression in a traditional set of simple epidemiological data, considering both discrimination and calibration properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A probabilidade de DAC obstrutiva deve orientar as decisões médicas. 3 Algoritmos de aprendizado de máquina ( machine learning — ML) podem complementar as capacidades diagnósticas e prognósticas dos métodos de regressão convencionais. A disparidade entre a aplicabilidade de tais métodos e os resultados alcançados com eles se deve às plataformas de software de análise de dados utilizadas.…”
unclassified
“…2 The likelihood of obstructive CAD should guide medical decisions. 3 Machine learning (ML) algorithms can supplement the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of conventional regression methods. The disparity between the applicability of such methods and the outcomes achieved with them was due to the data analysis software platforms used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%