2018
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.120638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nanoparticle-incorporated STING activator enhances antitumor immunity in PD-L1–insensitive models of triple-negative breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
164
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(68 reference statements)
4
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Packaging cGAMP in liposomal nanoparticles has demonstrated improved cellular uptake and better tumor control in transplantable and genetically engineered triple negative breast cancer models as well as the B16.F10 melanoma model . Another study found that liposomal formulated STING agonist can cause loss of APC viability, so the authors chose to load a STING agonist ex vivo into exosomes instead (Exosting).…”
Section: Sting Pathway Involvement In Anti‐tumor Immunity In Preclinimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Packaging cGAMP in liposomal nanoparticles has demonstrated improved cellular uptake and better tumor control in transplantable and genetically engineered triple negative breast cancer models as well as the B16.F10 melanoma model . Another study found that liposomal formulated STING agonist can cause loss of APC viability, so the authors chose to load a STING agonist ex vivo into exosomes instead (Exosting).…”
Section: Sting Pathway Involvement In Anti‐tumor Immunity In Preclinimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…121 Packaging cGAMP in liposomal nanoparticles has demonstrated improved cellular uptake and better tumor control in transplantable and genetically engineered triple negative breast cancer models as well as the B16.F10 melanoma model. 122 Another study found that liposomal formulated STING agonist can cause loss of APC viability, so the authors chose to load a STING agonist ex vivo into exosomes instead (Exosting). ExoSTING induced superior IFN-β production compared to soluble STING agonists and the responding mice were protected against tumor re-challenge (Society for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer Annual Meeting 2018 Poster P618).…”
Section: Novel Strategies For Sting Agonist Delivery By the Systemimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While promising immunotherapeutic agents, CDNs-anionic, highly water-soluble molecules-suffer from low bioavailability and poor drug-like properties. [26][27][28][29][30][31] As a result, CDNs do not readily cross the cellular plasma membrane leading to limited access to the cytosol where STING is located. 29 30 To address these drug delivery barriers, we have recently described STINGactivating nanoparticles (STING-NPs)-endosomedestabilizing polymer vesicles (polymersomes) optimized for intracellular delivery of 2'3'-cGAMP (cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate, cyclic(G(2',5')pA(3',5')p)), the natural and endogenous high affinity ligand of STING.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having identified T cells as direct cGAMP responders, we next turned our analysis to other immune cell types within the tumor. Numerous studies have identified macrophages as a key cell type in the STING-mediated antitumoral immune response (Cheng et al, 2018;Ohkuri et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2020b). Here, we provide evidence that F4/80 + macrophages directly respond to tumor-derived extracellular cGAMP.…”
Section: Intratumoral Macrophages and Nk Cells Directly Respond To Tumentioning
confidence: 54%