A narrative-interactionist approach to policy change analysis. Lessons from a case study of the cultural policy domain in Catalonia

Abstract

The cultural policy domain can be considered a relevant object of study for analyzing policy change processes in which policy discourse and the ambiguity of language have a central role. However, there are few studies that analyze cultural policy and policy change. This article therefore develops an approach for analyzing policy change based on evidence from a case study of the development of cultural policy in Catalonia. In this narrative interactionist approach, policy change is taken to mean the result of the symbolic interaction among political actors, within a relatively restricted institutional framework. Policy change is conditioned by the variations in the process of symbolic legitimation of government intervention, in this case in the cultural arena. By adapting the concept of frame alignment to policy change analysis, this article shows that the alignment between policy frames and a master frame underpins this symbolic legitimation. The process of alignment is dynamic and leads to a modification of the actors' policy frames.

Dynamics of policy change in authoritarian countries: a multiple-case study on China

“…These policy activities occur in political institution. Thus, authoritarian institutions, characterised by an uneven distribution of power, affect not only the rules of the game and the creation of new actors but also policy priorities, issue framing, discourse and the generation of new areas (Schmidt 2008;Mahoney and Thelen 2010;Radadelli et al 2012;Barbieri 2015). The influence of institutions on the development of conflict and policy change process is significant and large.…”

Analysis of public policy formulation and its effect on the technical and professional work of the community psychologist: A case study

“…The potential and importance of the analysis of policy frames is supported by its increasing use in the study of processes and trajectories of public policies in areas such as gender policies (Lombardo & Meier, 2009; Verloo, 2005); migration (Roggeband, 2010); cultural policies (Barbieri, 2015); social movements and collective action (Benford & David, 2000), among others, thus accumulating an increasing volume of empirical evidence (Roberts, 2016; Shim, Park, & Wilding, 2015).…”

Cultural policy governance, sub‑state actors, and nationalism: a comparative analysis based on the Spanish case

“…4 While it is only right to mention the key factors in structuring cultural policy, these schemes need to be compared in each context. This is because the literature has shown that the political agenda can also be based on other variables and interests, such as economic and political instrumentalisation (Barbieri, 2015;Gray, 2008;Parker and Parenta, 2009). Various agency factors have been shown to be determinants in the orientation and transformation of cultural policies.…”