2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02902.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A NarX–Tar chimera mediates repellent chemotaxis to nitrate and nitrite

Abstract: SummaryMembrane receptors communicate between the external world and the cell interior. In bacteria, these receptors include the transmembrane sensor kinases, which control gene expression via their cognate response regulators, and chemoreceptors, which control the direction of flagellar rotation via the CheA kinase and CheY response regulator. Here, we show that a chimeric protein that joins the ligandbinding, transmembrane and linker domains of the NarX sensor kinase to the signalling and adaptation domains … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant Taz (12) and Trz (13) are able to respond to aspartate and ribose in the medium, respectively, to activate ompC-lacZ in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that the chemoreceptors and EnvZ share a common signal transduction mechanism. Similar chimeric receptors have also been constructed using the periplasmic and transmembrane domain of Tar and the cytoplasmic domain of the human insulin receptor (14) or the periplasmic domain of the histidine kinase NarX and the cytoplasmic domain of Tar (15), further supporting a notion that there is a common mechanism widely used by signal transduction across the membrane in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Extensive studies on signal transduction through the transmembrane domain of chemotaxis receptors have been carried out, and various mechanisms have been proposed (16 -21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The resultant Taz (12) and Trz (13) are able to respond to aspartate and ribose in the medium, respectively, to activate ompC-lacZ in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that the chemoreceptors and EnvZ share a common signal transduction mechanism. Similar chimeric receptors have also been constructed using the periplasmic and transmembrane domain of Tar and the cytoplasmic domain of the human insulin receptor (14) or the periplasmic domain of the histidine kinase NarX and the cytoplasmic domain of Tar (15), further supporting a notion that there is a common mechanism widely used by signal transduction across the membrane in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Extensive studies on signal transduction through the transmembrane domain of chemotaxis receptors have been carried out, and various mechanisms have been proposed (16 -21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, symmetric structural changes (amino acid replacements, disulfide bonds) in the periplasmic sensing domain or TM bundle can also mimic chemoeffector signaling effects (shifted outputs, altered adaptation responses) (6,7,22,23,25,71). Moreover, the hybrid transducer Nart, which carries the periplasmic sensing through the HAMP domains of NarX joined to the methylation and kinase control domains of Tar (64,65), mediates chemotactic responses to nitrate, whose binding causes quasisymmetric piston displacements (19). We conclude that symmetric conformational inputs most likely modulate HAMP signaling by the same mechanism as that used for asymmetric TM2 piston displacements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, although the Trg-EnvZ hybrid Trz responds to ribose with increased kinase activity, its sensitivity to ribose is approximately 100-fold lower than that of Trg (5). A further hybrid has been constructed between the sensory domain of NarX and the methylation domain of Tar with a fusion point at AS-2.11 (50). This protein responds to ligand (nitrate) as a repellent, while Tar responds to its ligands Asp and MBP-maltose as attractants (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such hybrids have been made between different E. coli MCPs (16,24,40,51), Bacillus subtilis MCPs (25), the MCP Tar or Trg and the sensor kinase EnvZ (5,49), and the sensor kinase NarX and the MCP Tar (50). Most of these hybrids alter their output activity in response to ligand binding in their heterologous input domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%