2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A national study of a telephone support service for patients receiving office-based buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment: Study feasibility and sample description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest RCT (five times the size of the others combined) of fair quality (n=1426) is an industry-sponsored study where patients new to buprenorphine treatment were randomized to receive in-person buprenorphine MAT (TAU) or buprenorphine MAT plus a Here-To-Help (HTH) IT intervention consisting of calls from care coaches and access to online educational materials, treatment calendars, and self-reported information from previous participants. 26,60 At 12 months, ITT analysis indicated no significant difference between groups (55.0% HTH vs. 56.1% TAU, p-value=NR). Planned post-hoc analysis revealed that people who completed a greater number of intervention calls with coaches had a greater probability of retention in MAT (adjusted logistic regression Exp (β)=1.01, p<0.001) and 64 percent of participants in the HTH program who completed at least three HTH sessions remained in buprenorphine MAT compared with 56 percent in TAU (p<0.025).…”
Section: Health Information Technologymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The largest RCT (five times the size of the others combined) of fair quality (n=1426) is an industry-sponsored study where patients new to buprenorphine treatment were randomized to receive in-person buprenorphine MAT (TAU) or buprenorphine MAT plus a Here-To-Help (HTH) IT intervention consisting of calls from care coaches and access to online educational materials, treatment calendars, and self-reported information from previous participants. 26,60 At 12 months, ITT analysis indicated no significant difference between groups (55.0% HTH vs. 56.1% TAU, p-value=NR). Planned post-hoc analysis revealed that people who completed a greater number of intervention calls with coaches had a greater probability of retention in MAT (adjusted logistic regression Exp (β)=1.01, p<0.001) and 64 percent of participants in the HTH program who completed at least three HTH sessions remained in buprenorphine MAT compared with 56 percent in TAU (p<0.025).…”
Section: Health Information Technologymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Seven unique completed studies (three fair-quality RCTs, one poor-quality RCT, and three fair-quality cohort studies), [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]60 met the inclusion criteria for health IT interventions, including an active control involving in-person MAT as a comparator, and MAT retention as an outcome. Table 4 provides a summary of findings across health IT interventions and Appendix B Table 3 provides details for included studies.…”
Section: Health Information Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 324 SPRSs in 40 states successfully recruited patients into the study. For additional detail regarding study methodology, see Ref. 27.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was conducted as part of a larger project examining a new disease management program called HereToHelp™ (HTH), which was designed for opioid‐dependent patients new to buprenorphine 27 . HTH is a confidential, outbound, telephonic support program which was administered by the manufacturer of Suboxone ® and Subutex ® (Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc., Slough, United Kingdom).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several articles referred to TC as 'low cost'; 31,50,58,61,73,106,119 however, a handful of articles included further information on the cost of TC. 36,74,96,108,110,123 In summary, these articles describe per-participant costs ranging between approximately 100-200 dollars. The detailed cost information from these studies is reported here.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%