2020
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nationwide initiative to increase nursing and midwifery research leadership: overview of year one programme development, implementation and evaluation

Abstract: Aims and objectives: To report on the development, implementation and evaluation of the first year of the National Institute for Health Research 70@70 Senior Nurse Research Leader Programme. Background: Internationally, there is a lack of nursing and midwifery research and policy contribution to healthcare sectors. To address this, funding was obtained for a Senior Nurse and Midwife Research Leader Programme in England. The programme aimed to increase nursing and midwifery research capacity and capability and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout, the PSP engagement was sought at a grass roots level locally and at a national level, to influence policy and practice in healthcare systems. This ability to engage at all levels was facilitated through the 70@70 platform (Henshall, Greenfield, et al, 2020) which allowed existing links in local trusts to be capitalized on, whilst providing collective influence through the national profile of the programme. As the 70@70 programme was affiliated with England's National Institute for Health Research, this made it easier for the JLA PSP to gain traction and for its aim and purpose to be articulated by leaders at national meetings where policy and funding decisions were considered.…”
Section: Collective Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Throughout, the PSP engagement was sought at a grass roots level locally and at a national level, to influence policy and practice in healthcare systems. This ability to engage at all levels was facilitated through the 70@70 platform (Henshall, Greenfield, et al, 2020) which allowed existing links in local trusts to be capitalized on, whilst providing collective influence through the national profile of the programme. As the 70@70 programme was affiliated with England's National Institute for Health Research, this made it easier for the JLA PSP to gain traction and for its aim and purpose to be articulated by leaders at national meetings where policy and funding decisions were considered.…”
Section: Collective Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their positioning, nurses often lack the research expertise, confidence or engagement required to lead others in the healthcare system. Reasons for this are multifaceted and include a lack of protected time to undertake research training, unstructured career progression pathways to support them, a lack of mentorship and role‐modelling and limited buy in from partner organizations (Henshall, Greenfield, et al, 2020; Henshall, Kozlowska, et al, 2020). This problem is exacerbated in community nursing where there is a lack of clinical academic nurses and sub‐optimal use of the evidence‐base in clinical decision‐making (Bowers, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recognition of the many challenges that nurses face in developing their research skillsets and as part of the NIHR SNMRL Programme (Henshall et al, 2020b), a series of academic writing retreats for nurses were developed by an SNMRL nurse based in the South of England. The aim was to promote engagement in research and to provide nurses with the time, space and support required to enable them to produce high quality academic research publications for submission to peer reviewed academic journals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The development of research leaders, on the other hand, has the potential to increase the clinical area or team's research profile. 32 The effectiveness of implemented initiatives to improve RCC among multidisciplinary healthcare professionals should be evaluated based on a combination of tangible traditional metrics (ie, publications, funding grants) and non-tangible metrics which take into consideration contextual influences (eg, attitudes, identity, expectations,) 33 and changes on relational structures (eg, partnerships and networks, communications) essential for research success/skills. 34…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%