“…Initially, it was found that patients made the apprehension of percepts predominantly in detail, in spite of the D% being below the reference values, indicating lack of interest for the concrete and the real. On the other hand, the mean number of global answers was slightly high, which may reflect a defensive behaviour using a global and adaptive reality against the emergence of representations and/or affections (Chabert, 1998;Oneto et al, 2009). In the second moment of assessment, we noticed a decrease in defensive conduct, with a slight increase in projective capacity, which may be explained by the familiarisation with the testing situation, on the one hand, and, alternatively, by the decrease in the use of defensive mechanisms (normal G% and D%).…”