2007
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2007.907472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Near-Maximum-Likelihood Decoding Algorithm for MIMO Systems Based on Semi-Definite Programming

Abstract: In Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) systems, Maximum-Likelihood (ML) decoding is equivalent to finding the closest lattice point in an N -dimensional complex space. In general, this problem is known to be NP hard. In this paper, we propose a quasi-maximum likelihood algorithm based on Semi-Definite Programming (SDP). We introduce several SDP relaxation models for MIMO systems, with increasing complexity. We use interior-point methods for solving the models and obtain a near-ML performance with polynomial comput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given an observed noisy output vector y ∈ R m , problem (31) must be solved for decoding the binary input vector x ∈ {−1, +1} n for a matrix Q ∈ R m×n [22,23,26]. Letting z = 1 2 (1 + x) and b = 1 2 Q1 + y, we can state (31) in the conic quadratic form min t : ||Qz − b|| ≤ t, z ∈ {0, 1} n , t ∈ R + .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given an observed noisy output vector y ∈ R m , problem (31) must be solved for decoding the binary input vector x ∈ {−1, +1} n for a matrix Q ∈ R m×n [22,23,26]. Letting z = 1 2 (1 + x) and b = 1 2 Q1 + y, we can state (31) in the conic quadratic form min t : ||Qz − b|| ≤ t, z ∈ {0, 1} n , t ∈ R + .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ways to relax problem (4) into an SDP; see, e.g., [17,10,7,8,18]. For the sake of simplicity, we shall follow the approach of Mao et al [7].…”
Section: Semidefinite Relaxation Of the ML Detection Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, many sub-optimal but efficient heuristics have been proposed for solving the ML detection problem (see, e.g., [1] for a brief overview). One such heuristiccalled the semidefinite relaxation (SDR) detector -has attracted a lot of interest recently (see, e.g., [12,5,17,1,10,8,7,18,6]). Roughly speaking, the SDR detector solves a convex relaxation of * E-mail: manchoso@se.cuhk.edu.hk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is achieved at the cost of huge computational complexity, which increases exponentially with the number of users. In the last decade, a variety of multiuser detectors with low complexity and sub-optimum performance were proposed, such as linear detectors [33], subtractive interference canceling [25], semidefinite programming approach by using interior-point methods [22,24,31,34], sphere decoder [14] and heuristic methods [7,8,21,27,28]. The last three methods have been used for solving different detection models and obtaining near-maximum likelihood (near-ML) performance at cost of polynomial computational complexity, except for the sphere decoder algorithm whose expected complexity increases exponentially according to the number of users for large size problems [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, heuristic algorithms have been applied to symbol detection in non-spreading multiple-input multiple-output systems [4,24]. PSO heuristic method has been applied to non-spreading MIMO multiuser detection on 16-and 64-QAM modulation [19,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%