2006
DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/jzl032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Neat Embedding Theorem for Expansions of Cylindric Algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, we can dispense with some of the CA axioms when we get to ω extra dimensions. We note that FPEA α enjoys a NET as well [15]. It is known that for infinite α, Dc α ⊆ Nr α CA β for all β > α [7, Theorem 2.6.74].…”
Section: Wwwmlq-journalorgmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In other words, we can dispense with some of the CA axioms when we get to ω extra dimensions. We note that FPEA α enjoys a NET as well [15]. It is known that for infinite α, Dc α ⊆ Nr α CA β for all β > α [7, Theorem 2.6.74].…”
Section: Wwwmlq-journalorgmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We note that our construction quite easily leads to the (new) fact that the Omitting Types Theorem fails for finite first order definable extensions of finite variable fragments of first order logic studied in [5] and [16] as long as the number of variables is > 2.…”
Section: Omitting Types For Finite Variable Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is not the end of the story; in fact, this is where the fun begins. A new unexpected viewpoint can yield dividends, and indeed the notion of neat reducts has been revived lately, to mention a few references: [3], [4], [2], [5], [1], [31], [53], [20], [23], [19], and [7]. In this paper, we survey (briefly) such results on neat reducts, putting them in a wider perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%