1982
DOI: 10.2307/3213838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A necessary condition for extinction in those bisexual Galton-Watson branching processes governed by superadditive mating functions

Abstract: Mating functions considered by Asmussen (1980) and Daley (1968) for the class of bisexual Galton-Watson branching processes (GWBP) are shown to be superadditive. Consideration of a process that allows only sibling mating leads to a necessary condition for almost sure extinction in bisexual GWBP governed by superadditive mating functions. A simple example shows that the condition is not sufficient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As was pointed out in Hull (1982), this is not a serious restriction. Indeed, it is reasonable to assume that a given number of females and males living together in the same environment will give rise to more mating units than if they form separate groups living in different non-communicated environments.…”
Section: The Probability Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As was pointed out in Hull (1982), this is not a serious restriction. Indeed, it is reasonable to assume that a given number of females and males living together in the same environment will give rise to more mating units than if they form separate groups living in different non-communicated environments.…”
Section: The Probability Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[2], [9] or [14]) and models where mating or reproduction (or both processes) are affected by the number of couples in the population (see Refs. [23], [25,26] or [34]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to(13), when mf −1 ≤ c −1 2 , or equivalently when f m −1 ≥ c 2 , then the mating strategy 1 is applied; when mf −1 ≥ c 2 then the mating strategy 3 is put in practice; and otherwise, the mating strategy 2 is carried out. From(14), when the number of female smolts is less than or equal to the number of male smolts then, the reproduction strategy 1 is assumed, where the production of female smolts is promoted. On the contrary, if the number of female…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Daley's model the offspring distribution and the function governing the matings between females and males are the same for each generation. Such a model has received some attention in the literature; see, for example, Rösler (1996, 2002), Bagley (1986), Bruss (1984), Daley et al (1986), González and Molina (1996, 1997), or Hull (1982. More recently, with the objective to model the probabilistic evolution of more complex two-sex populations, various classes of bisexual branching processes have been introduced and some theory about them developed; see, for instance, González et al (2000González et al ( , 2001, Molina et al (2002Molina et al ( , 2003Molina et al ( , 2004aMolina et al ( , 2004b or Xing and Wang (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%