A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey

Abstract

BackgroundPatient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have extensive associations with other variables and can be prioritized to engage patients.MethodsWe used the 2014 International Health Policy Survey (IHPS), which provided information on elder adults in 11 countries with details in patient characteristics, healthcare experiences, and patient-physician communication. Patient engagement or support was measured with eight variables including patients’ treatment choices, involvement, and treatment priority setting. Three types of care were identified: primary, specialist and chronic illness care. Specialists were doctors specializing in one area of health care. Chronic illness included eight chronic conditions surveyed. Expert knowledge was used to assist variable selection. We used Bayesian network models consisting of nodes that represented variables of interest and arcs that represented their relationships.ResultsAmong 25,530 participants, the mean age was 68.51 years and 57.40% were females. The distributions of age, sex, education, and patient engagement were significantly different across countries. For chronic illness care, written plans provided by professionals were linked to treatment feasibility and helpfulness. Whether professionals contacted patients was associated with the availability of professionals they could reach for chronic illness care. For specialist care, if specialists provided treatment choices, patients were more likely to be involved and discuss about what mattered to them.ConclusionThe strategies to engage patients may depend on the types of care, specialist or chronic illness care. For the study on the observational IHPS data, network modeling is useful to integrate expert knowledge. We suggest considering other theory-based patient engagement in major surveys, as well as engaging patients in their healthcare by providing written plans and actively communicating with patients for chronic illnesses, and encouraging specialists to discuss and provide treatment options.

Sex-Specific Differences in the Association of Metabolically Healthy Obesity With Hyperuricemia and a Network Perspective in Analyzing Factors Related to Hyperuricemia

“…BN modeling enables simultaneous exploration of interrelationships among a large number of diseases and their related risk factors, without affecting the interpretability of the network ( 43 , 49 ). Another advantage of BN modeling is that, thanks to Markov blanket theory, complex models can be divided into a collection of simpler models that which are mathematically tractable and computationally simpler ( 71 ).…”

“…BNs were constructed from the data by the following steps: (1) apply one of the most commonly used heuristic algorithms, Tabu ( 47 ), for graphical structure learning along with the Bayesian Information Criterion score ( 48 ); (2) examine the stabilities of arcs in the networks from averaging 300 bootstrapped networks, and estimate the strengths of arcs by averaging the probability of the arcs presenting in the bootstrapped networks ( 49 ); (3) determine the structure and directions of arcs between variables using the averaged network; (4) query the conditional probability distributions (Bayesian reasoning) in the final networks and (5) visualize the final networks ( 50 ).…”

Bayesian Networks and Causal Inference for the Interpretation of Patients' Symptom Experience

“…In principle, such causal graphs can be used to answer questions related to: (i) causal discovery (e.g., which symptom(s), among many co-occurring symptoms, can influence another distinct symptom) and (ii) causal inference (e.g., of what magnitude and causal connection -direct or confounding -these symptoms affect the aforementioned sentinel or core symptom). 17 Because of BNA's ability to handle both observable as well as uncertain information (i.e., latent factors from observational data), [18][19][20] BNA has been used in biomedical informatics for more than two decades.…”

“…BNs are suitable tools for the probabilistic inference that can aid in clinical decision making for several reasons. 18,[21][22][23] For example, they provide a visual representation of causality that can be easily understood by a clinician. 22,24,25 They can integrate knowledge from clinical experts into their modelling procedures while learning the structure and parameters of a network through the available data.…”

Networking analysis on superior vena cava arrhythmogenicity in atrial fibrillation

“…This model can be used for intelligent information processing such as probabilistic causation of clinical parameters and profile of cell signaling including uncertainty by using probability calculation. Recently, Bayesian network analysis is applied for clinical practice with electric health record [1,2] and intricate hierarchical analysis [3]. Bayesian network analysis in studies of a single disease such as Alzheimer's disease [4] and hip fracture [5] facilitates the probability causation and hierarchical structure.…”