17Spatial suppression (SS) is a visual perceptual phenomenon that is manifest in a 18 reduction of directional sensitivity for drifting high-contrast gratings whose size exceeds 19 the center of the visual field. The role of neural excitation and inhibition in SS is still 20 debated. Putatively, the efficacy of inhibition in the visual cortex can be inferred from the 21 attenuation of MEG visual gamma responses with increasing velocity of large high-22contrast visual gratings. We have found that this neural measure predicted inter-23 individual differences in SS equally well in adult women and in school-age boys. The 24 neuro-behavioral correlations were robust: besides being unaffected by age and gender 25 of the participants, they were replicated in two measurement sessions separated by 26 several days or weeks. This study provides evidence that links the psychophysical 27 phenomenon of spatial suppression to inhibitory-based neural responses in the human 28 primary visual cortex. 29 30 Keywords: Magnetoencephalography (MEG), gamma oscillations, spatial suppression, surround 31 suppression, inhibition, IQ 32 33 34 65 (Born and Bradley, 2005). Tadin and colleagues have shown that TMS-induced periods of reduced 66 excitability in MT were associated with weakening of SS, and suggested that such disruptive TMS 67 is interfering with inhibitory processing within MT/V5, which, in turn, improves perception of 68 large moving stimuli (Tadin, et al., 2011). Contrasting this view, studies in monkeys demonstrate 69 that the strength of neuronal surround suppression in the MT is low and cannot explain the 70 3 reported high level of deterioration in behavioral performance (Liu, et al., 2016). Moreover, many
71MT neurons in monkeys did not exhibit surround suppression at all (Liu, et al., 2016).
72A recent human study combining behavioral psychophysics, functional MRI and magnetic 73 resonance spectroscopy (Schallmo, et al., 2018) further challenged the proposed role of 74 heightened inhibitory transmission within MT in SS. Although increasing the size of moving 75 gratings did suppress fMRI responses in MT, the suppression was much more subtle than, and 76 could thus be considered secondary to, that in the primary visual cortex (V1). Further, the authors 77 did not find the expected direct association between SS measured in a psychophysical task and 78 the concentration of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA in either area MT or the early visual 79 cortex. In a similar vein, GABA concentration was unrelated to the fMRI response suppression 80 caused by increasing the size of drifting gratings. Therefore, Schallmo et al. came to the 81 conclusion that SS is not primarily driven by GABA-mediated inhibition.
82Given the complex dynamic nature of the excitatory-inhibitory interactions elicited by 83 large moving gratings that has been revealed in animal studies (Angelucci, et al., 2017; Angelucci 84 and Bressloff, 2006;Nurminen, et al., 2018), individual variations in the baseline 'bulk' GABA 85 concentration in visual a...