1978
DOI: 10.1126/science.644324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Neural Map of Auditory Space in the Owl

Abstract: Auditory units that responded to sound only when it originated from a limited area of space were found in the lateral and anterior portions of the midbrain auditory nucleus of the owl (Tyto alba). The areas of space to which these units responded (their receptive fields) were largely independent of the nature and intensity of the sound stimulus. The units were arranged systematically within the midbrain auditory nucleus according to the relative locations of their receptive fields, thus creating a physiologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
266
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
15
266
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the neural level, one such internal representation that seems to be involved in this decision-making process is an auditory space map in the midbrain. In the barn owl, external space is represented by topographical neuronal populations that exhibit firing patterns largely consistent with the assumptions listed above (Knudsen and Konishi, 1978). Moreover, the widths of cumulative neural response histograms closely correspond to the size of the MAA 2007).…”
Section: Relating Behavioral Measures To Neural Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…At the neural level, one such internal representation that seems to be involved in this decision-making process is an auditory space map in the midbrain. In the barn owl, external space is represented by topographical neuronal populations that exhibit firing patterns largely consistent with the assumptions listed above (Knudsen and Konishi, 1978). Moreover, the widths of cumulative neural response histograms closely correspond to the size of the MAA 2007).…”
Section: Relating Behavioral Measures To Neural Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Certainly, this kind of general auditory ability does exist, but it is no part of auditory localization, either psychologically or physiologically. Animals perceive the location of sounding objects only by means of neural structures specialized to take advantage of the systematic but special relation between proximal stimulus and distal location (see, for example, Knudsen, 1984). The relation is systematic for obvious reasons; it is special because it depends on the circumstance that the animal has two ears, and that the ears are set a certain distance apart.…”
Section: How the Motor Theory Makes Speech Perception Like Other Specmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Neurons in these layers respond to sounds that arrive from a certain location in space (space-specific neurons) and are organized to form a mapped representation of auditory space (Knudsen and Konishi 1978;Knudsen 1982). An auditory map is not unique to barn owls; all species studied show some degree of topographic representation of auditory space in the OT (Lewald and Dorrscheidt 1998;King and Palmer 1985;King and Hutchings 1987).…”
Section: The Barn Owl's Otmentioning
confidence: 99%