2001
DOI: 10.1243/0954405011519547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural network approach to the modelling and analysis of stereolithography processes

Abstract: Stereolithography has attracted more attention due to better part build accuracy than other rapid prototyping technologies. However, this build method still limits wider applications due to the unsatisfactory level of dimensional accuracy that remains with the current technology. To improve accuracy and reduce part distortion, understanding the physics involved in the relationship between the operating input parameters and the part dimensional accuracy is prerequisite. In this paper, this causality is identi®e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polymer vat‐polymerization additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are frequently selected in dentistry to fabricate different devices such as casts, silicone indices, custom trays, surgical guides, positioning guides, interim restorations, and occlusal guards 1–4 . Even though the implementation of AM technologies is gradually increasing in restorative procedures, the optimal printing variables 5–13 that influence the manufacturing accuracy of each dental device based on the manufacturing trinomial selected, namely AM technology (stereolithography, direct light processing, or stereolithography liquid crystal display based), 14,15 3D printer (resolution and printer accuracy, 5,6 power of light source, wavelength power), 16,17 and resin (color, 18,19 polymerization initiators, and viscosity) remains unclear (Fig 1). 20–26 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer vat‐polymerization additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are frequently selected in dentistry to fabricate different devices such as casts, silicone indices, custom trays, surgical guides, positioning guides, interim restorations, and occlusal guards 1–4 . Even though the implementation of AM technologies is gradually increasing in restorative procedures, the optimal printing variables 5–13 that influence the manufacturing accuracy of each dental device based on the manufacturing trinomial selected, namely AM technology (stereolithography, direct light processing, or stereolithography liquid crystal display based), 14,15 3D printer (resolution and printer accuracy, 5,6 power of light source, wavelength power), 16,17 and resin (color, 18,19 polymerization initiators, and viscosity) remains unclear (Fig 1). 20–26 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms, such as the ANNs, GA, case-based reasoning (CBR), GA methods coupled with data envelopment analysis, etc. have been widely applied to many fields such as bankruptcy prediction (Lee et al [16]), stock market prediction [1,9,12,17], and all types of sales prediction. Researchers have compared different prediction methods in references [8,13,18,19].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various statistical and numerical methodologies have been implemented to predict and optimise several laser manufacturing processes including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) (Lee et al 2001); Genetic Algorithms (GA) (Ye, Yuan and Zhou, 2009), Design of Experiments (DoE) (Karazi, Issa and Brabazon, 2009), Finite Element Analysis (FEA) (de Deus and Mazumder, 1996), Ant Colony optimisation (AC) (Wang and Xie, 2005), and Fuzzy Logic (FL) (Shen et al 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%