2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new alternative adsorbent for the removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the correlation coefficients R 2 of 1 PFO was lower than the R 2 of PSO implying that the predicted q e values of PFO 2 deviated reasonably from the experimental values. The PSO fitted very well to the 3 adsorption behavior indicating that the intraparticle diffusion was involved in the 4 adsorption process [22]. 5 3.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, the correlation coefficients R 2 of 1 PFO was lower than the R 2 of PSO implying that the predicted q e values of PFO 2 deviated reasonably from the experimental values. The PSO fitted very well to the 3 adsorption behavior indicating that the intraparticle diffusion was involved in the 4 adsorption process [22]. 5 3.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, the existence of large number of smaller particles would provide the adsorption system with a greater surface area for adsorption of phenol from the solution. The adsorption capacity is directly proportional to the total surface area exposed, whereas it is inversely proportional to the particle size diameter for non-porous adsorbents [35,36]. In a study conducted by Roostaei and Tezel (2004) on phenol removal through the adsorption using silica gel, HiSiv TM 3000, activated alumina, activated carbon, Filtrasorb-400, and HiSiv TM 1000, it was revealed that powdered HiSiv TM 1000 (particle size < 100 m) has the best kinetics result with the highest rate of adsorption [37].…”
Section: The E Ect Of Nano-bioadsorbent Dosagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm model can be presented as in Eq. (3) [35,36], where q e is the equilibrium adsorption capacity of phenol on the adsorbent (mgg 1 ), C e is the equilibrium dye concentration in solution (mgL 1 ), q m is the maximum capacity of the adsorbent (mgg 1 ), and k L is the Langmuir adsorption constant (Lmg 1 ):…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the existence of large number of smaller particles would provide the adsorption system with a greater surface area for adsorption of phenol from the solution. The adsorption capacity is directly proportional to the total surface area exposed whereas for non-porous adsorbents it is inversely proportional to the particle size diameter [35,36]. In a study conducted by Roostaei et al (2004) on phenol removal through the adsorption using silica gel, HiSiv™ 3000, activated alumina, activated carbon, Filtrasorb-400, and HiSiv™ 1000 it was revealed that powdered HiSiv™ 1000 (Particle size < 100µm) has the best kinetics result with the highest rate of adsorption [37].…”
Section: The Effect Of Particle Size Of the Nano-bioadsorbentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also assumes that when a site is occupied by an adsorbate molecule, no more adsorption takes place at this site. The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm model can be presented as Eq.3 [35,36], where q e is the equilibrium adsorption capacity of phenol on the adsorbent (mgg -1 ), C e , is the equilibrium dye concentration in solution (mgL -1 ), q m , is the maximum capacity of the adsorbent (mgg -1 ), and k L is the Langmuir adsorption constant…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermmentioning
confidence: 99%