Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3377929.3390024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to distribute MOEA pareto front computation

Abstract: Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) offer compelling solutions to many real world problems, including software engineering ones. However, their efficiency decreases with the growing size of the problems at hand, hindering their applicability in practice. In this paper we propose a novel master-worker approach to distribute the computation of the Pareto Front (PF) for MOEAs (dubbed MOEA-DPF) and empirically evaluate it on a real-world software project management problem. With respect to previous wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, if the testers find themselves in at least one of those two situations, then the training cost of Sentinel can be a good price to pay for the significant mutant reduction trade-off provided by the generated strategies, specially considering that doing an exhaustive manual experimentation to find the best conventional strategy was more expensive than Sentinel training for six out of 10 systems (as seen in Section 5.3). Moreover, Sentinel's training cost can be further reduced by running it in parallel [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, if the testers find themselves in at least one of those two situations, then the training cost of Sentinel can be a good price to pay for the significant mutant reduction trade-off provided by the generated strategies, specially considering that doing an exhaustive manual experimentation to find the best conventional strategy was more expensive than Sentinel training for six out of 10 systems (as seen in Section 5.3). Moreover, Sentinel's training cost can be further reduced by running it in parallel [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%