2017
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2017.2686300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Buck–Boost Converter With Low-Voltage Stress and Reduced Conducting Components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of suffering higher current stress in turn-on mode ((13)-(16)), conduction and turn off/on losses of MOSFET S 1 are more than the MOSFET S 2 . On the basis of (19) to (22), conduction and turn off/on losses of the MOSFETs are second and first order functions of current. Because of the fact that the conduction loss of MOSFETs is much lower than their turn off/on power losses in IRFB4227 series, the portion of MOSFETs losses in comparison with the total converter loss is increased by decreasing the voltage gain ratio (V in = 40).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because of suffering higher current stress in turn-on mode ((13)-(16)), conduction and turn off/on losses of MOSFET S 1 are more than the MOSFET S 2 . On the basis of (19) to (22), conduction and turn off/on losses of the MOSFETs are second and first order functions of current. Because of the fact that the conduction loss of MOSFETs is much lower than their turn off/on power losses in IRFB4227 series, the portion of MOSFETs losses in comparison with the total converter loss is increased by decreasing the voltage gain ratio (V in = 40).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the converters in Banaei and Bonab and Banaei and Sani 18,20 have a higher voltage gain at duty cycle range between 0 < D < 0.65, more storage components ( 18,20 ) and negative polarity of the output voltage (Banaei and Bonab 18 ) restrict applications of these converters. Also in Son et al, 19 despite lower number of elements, the converter cannot offer better performance than the SQBuBoC because of its discontinuous input current, lack of a common ground between the input and output voltages, existence of two switches with asynchronous operation, and lower voltage gain. Figure 3B describes the voltage stress across the main power switch versus duty cycle of the proposed SQBuBoC and other converters introduced in the Table 1 in the same output voltage.…”
Section: Power Loss Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Как сказано ранее, силовая часть КПППН представляет собой последовательное соединение понижающего и повышающего преобразователей постоянного напряжения. Расчет номиналов их компонентов ведется на основании известных методик [2,[12][13][14][15].…”
unclassified