2012 IEEE Radar Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2012.6212125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new CFAR processor based on guard cells information

Abstract: Radar detection procedures involve the comparison of the received signal amplitude to a threshold. In order to obtain a constant false-alarm rate (CFAR), an adaptive threshold must be applied reflecting the local clutter situation. This paper presents an intelligent CFAR technique based on comparing the performance of five existing CFAR processors at different target and clutter situations. The proposed intelligent CFAR processor selects the adaptive threshold which is calculated by the best CFAR processor for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thresholding process is achieved through realizing a Cell-Averaging Constant False Alarm Rate (CA-CFAR) processor with total window size of 16 cells [21]. Figure (6) shows the relation between the probabilities of false alarm for Nyquist rate based approaches (ℓ 1 -norm and CAMP), Pseudo random based approach, and traditional FFT-based approach at different CFAR threshold gain.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thresholding process is achieved through realizing a Cell-Averaging Constant False Alarm Rate (CA-CFAR) processor with total window size of 16 cells [21]. Figure (6) shows the relation between the probabilities of false alarm for Nyquist rate based approaches (ℓ 1 -norm and CAMP), Pseudo random based approach, and traditional FFT-based approach at different CFAR threshold gain.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm is designed to has good detection for neighboring targets. On the other hand, this tends to increase the probability of false alarm specially, in the presence of inhomogeneous clutter or high sidelobes [7]. To illustrate the enhancement in target detection, some scenarios have been assumed in the following section.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of the Nested Compound Optimum Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major challenge for radar systems is how to detect weak target signals from the strong ground clutter of airport runway background [10]. The constant false alarm rate (CFAR) methods including cell-average CFAR (CA-CFAR) [11] and cluttermap CFAR (CM-CFAR) [12] are widely utilized in radar automatic target recognition systems. CFAR can automatically adjust the threshold to detect targets when the intensity of external interference changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%