1999
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.125.11.1252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Classification for Malignant Tumors Involving the Anterior Skull Base

Abstract: We propose the use of our staging system by all those specialists in the field willing to validate the classification and possibly apply it for clinical and investigational purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Series that include significant number of cases without cribriform plate involvement show an overall cure rate of about 60% to 70% 11,14,18,24,25 ; when there is intracranial invasion, survival drops to less than 30%. 4,11 Both recurrence rate (12% vs 60%) 26 and disease-free survival (82% vs 38%) 27 have improved after the use of craniofacial resection of the ethmoid compared with the precraniofacial era. However, it is not well established whether craniofacial resection of the ethmoid improves the outcome of patients with tumors that do not involve the bony structures of the anterior skull base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Series that include significant number of cases without cribriform plate involvement show an overall cure rate of about 60% to 70% 11,14,18,24,25 ; when there is intracranial invasion, survival drops to less than 30%. 4,11 Both recurrence rate (12% vs 60%) 26 and disease-free survival (82% vs 38%) 27 have improved after the use of craniofacial resection of the ethmoid compared with the precraniofacial era. However, it is not well established whether craniofacial resection of the ethmoid improves the outcome of patients with tumors that do not involve the bony structures of the anterior skull base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UICC classification system (edition published in 2002) 3 and the staging system proposed by Cantu et al 4 (INT system) ( Table 1) were used to validate the usefulness of both systems as prognostic factors in our series. According to the UICC-AJCC staging , 4 tumors were staged T2, 28 T3, 18 T4a, and 50 T4b.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still no widely accepted classification for carcinomas located in the sphenoid and frontal sinus. The practical, clinical and prognostic use of the T classification for tumors in this region is still controversial, and alternative classifications have been proposed in the past few years (54). The most widely applied system is the one described by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (55).…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still no widely accepted classification for carcinomas located in the sphenoid and frontal sinus. The practical, clinical and prognostic use of the T classification for tumors in this region is still discussed controversially, and alternative classifications have been proposed in the past few years [37]. For the maxillary sinus (ICD-O C31.0), the classification is as follows: T1 for tumors of the antral mucosa without infiltration or destruction of the bone; T2 for tumors with destruction of the bony structure, excluding the posterior wall and including an extension to the hard palate or the lower and middle nasal passage; T3 defines tumors infiltrating the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus, the subcutaneous tissue, the floor or the medial wall of the orbit or the ethmoid sinus, the infratemporal fossa or the pterygopalatine fossa; T4 tumors of the maxillary sinus infiltrate the skull base, the nasopharynx, the sphenoid or the frontal sinus.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%