2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new classification system for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine based on magnetic resonance imaging, provocative discography, plain radiographs and anatomic considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Recently, authors such as Thalgott developed classifications to correlate not only the resonance changes but also the findings of X-ray images and discographies, enabling a better designation of indications for arthrodesis and arthroplasty. 20 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Recently, authors such as Thalgott developed classifications to correlate not only the resonance changes but also the findings of X-ray images and discographies, enabling a better designation of indications for arthrodesis and arthroplasty. 20 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The disc degeneration was classified as described by Pfirrmann et al, 8 since this presents excellent intra and interobserver reliability. Benneker et al 1 correlated the findings relating to magnetic resonance, simple radiography, biochemical abnormalities and morphological abnormalities from 39 intervertebral discs from cadavers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6 Degeneration of the intervertebral discs has been studied and classified by many authors. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The classifications range from studies of purely histological nature on the discs 10 and on variations in their endplates, 7 to classifications of abnormalities of the nucleus pulposus in relation to the annulus fibrosus and the thickness of the discs seen on magnetic resonance images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MR examinations were performed with a 1.0 T device (GE Signa Horizon, UK), and they included the T1 and T2 weighted sagittal and axial MRI of the cervical and lumbar spine. The grading of findings in the cervical spine [17] is presented in Table 1, and the grading of the lumbar spine findings [29] is presented in Table 2. The design of this study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Central Finland Health Care District (Jyväskylä, Finland) before data collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%