2014
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Clinically Based Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: OBJECTIVES Current staging systems for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) are inadequate, as they are based on surgical pathology and therefore not relevant to unresectable patients. Clinical trials for potential targeted therapies for pCCA are hampered by the lack of an accurate, nonoperative staging system for predicting survival. We aimed at developing a clinical staging system for pCCA, which would be of prognostic relevance for all pCCA patients and help stratify patients for clinical trials. METHODS C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
111
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this factor was not included in the Mayo Clinic clinical staging system as the staging system was aimed to be applicable for all patients regardless of treatment received. Inconsistent with the findings reported in the development cohort,15 we did not observe the association between ECOG status and survival, likely due to the small number of patients with ECOG 2–4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this factor was not included in the Mayo Clinic clinical staging system as the staging system was aimed to be applicable for all patients regardless of treatment received. Inconsistent with the findings reported in the development cohort,15 we did not observe the association between ECOG status and survival, likely due to the small number of patients with ECOG 2–4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This discrepancy was most likely due to the difference in treatment modality given to early stage patients. Specifically, none of the patients in our study received liver transplantation while 43.4% of stage I patients in the previous study15 were treated with liver transplantation. Nonetheless, when comparing survivals of those receiving resection and palliative biliary stenting between the two cohorts, it appears that there was not much difference in survival of the present cohort and the development cohort, that is 17.3 versus 25.3 months for resection and 4.1 versus 5.8 months for stenting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Multiple staging systems are available to predict prognosis in patients with (suspected) PHC [4, 8-10]. However, the majority of staging systems, such as the frequently used American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, are applicable only to a minority of patients who undergo resection [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%