2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39339-1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Conjecture, a New Invariant, and a New Non-splitting Result

Abstract: We prove a new non-splitting result for the cohomology of the Milnor fiber, reminiscent of the classical result proved independently by Lazzeri, Gabrielov, and Lê in 1973-74. We do this while exploring a conjecture of Bobadilla about a stronger version of our nonsplitting result. To explore this conjecture, we define a new numerical invariant for hypersurfaces with 1-dimensional critical loci: the beta invariant. The beta invariant is an invariant of the ambient topological-type of the hypersurface, is non-n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following numerical invariant, defined and discussed in [6], is crucial to the contents and goal of this paper.…”
Section: Notation and Known Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following numerical invariant, defined and discussed in [6], is crucial to the contents and goal of this paper.…”
Section: Notation and Known Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Proposition 2.4, β f may be equivalently expressed as It is shown in [6] that β f ≥ 0. The interesting question is how strong the requirement that β f = 0 is.…”
Section: Notation and Known Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Question 6.2. One notes that the formula for the dimension of the vector space [2]) 0 in Theorem 5.1 is very similar to the beta invariant, β f , of a hypersurface V (f ) with one-dimensional singular locus (defined by David Massey in [12], and further explored by the author and Massey in [10]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We have written about Bobadilla's Conjecture twice before, in [4] and [2]. The conjecture is: Conjecture 6.4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%