2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Constraint on the Nuclear Equation of State from Statistical Distributions of Compact Remnants of Supernovae

Abstract: Understanding how matter behaves at the highest densities and temperatures is a major open problem in both nuclear physics and relativistic astrophysics. Our understanding of such behavior is often encapsulated in the so-called high-temperature nuclear equation of state (EOS), which influences compact binary mergers, core-collapse supernovae, and other phenomena. Our focus is on the type (either black hole or neutron star) and mass of the remnant of the core collapse of a massive star. For each six candidates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our models densely cover a range of neutron star masses at and above the theoretical minimum of ∼1.4 M e but well below the largest observed neutron star mass. The mass distribution of NSs from our models is also consistent with that of isolated neutron stars observed to date (Meskhi et al 2022). We note that the large (∼15 km) radii of our neutron stars with the TM1 and the NL3 EOS are largely inconsistent with constraints on neutron star radii from GW observations of a binary neutron star merger (Abbott et al 2018) and those from X-ray observations of pulsars with NICER (Raaijmakers et al 2021), as well as with the combined constraints derived by Legred et al (2021).…”
Section: Numerical Setup and Modelssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our models densely cover a range of neutron star masses at and above the theoretical minimum of ∼1.4 M e but well below the largest observed neutron star mass. The mass distribution of NSs from our models is also consistent with that of isolated neutron stars observed to date (Meskhi et al 2022). We note that the large (∼15 km) radii of our neutron stars with the TM1 and the NL3 EOS are largely inconsistent with constraints on neutron star radii from GW observations of a binary neutron star merger (Abbott et al 2018) and those from X-ray observations of pulsars with NICER (Raaijmakers et al 2021), as well as with the combined constraints derived by Legred et al (2021).…”
Section: Numerical Setup and Modelssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Given a gravitational wave signal from the coalescence of compact objects, the identification of a sub-solar mass black hole could be complicated by "mimickers" such as sub-solar mass neutron stars or boson stars [60]. While such objects themselves would be astrophysically exotic [61][62][63] and potentially sourced from dark matter [64], it is not yet clear how well current methods of gravitational-wave data analysis will distinguish between sub-solar mass black holes and these alternatives. For example, when analyzing a low-significance sub-solar mass trigger, ref.…”
Section: Jcap11(2023)039mentioning
confidence: 99%