1999
DOI: 10.1353/chq.0.1108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Defense of Nonsense; or, Where Then Is His Phallus? and Other Questions Not to Ask

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Feng, 2009) Carroll's nonsense is never the absence of sense; instead, a strong presence of 'sense' is inherent in the 'non-sense'. (Heyman 1999) A nonsense text actually 'does not seek to limit the text's meaning to one single interpretation-on the contrary, its dissolution of sense multiplies meaning.' (Lecercle 1994: 20) It often turns out that the nonsense texts need meaning, 'at least as much, and perhaps even more so, than meaningful texts ... ' (ibid: 115) Readers need to use their linguistic imagination to explore the meaning and appreciate the humour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Feng, 2009) Carroll's nonsense is never the absence of sense; instead, a strong presence of 'sense' is inherent in the 'non-sense'. (Heyman 1999) A nonsense text actually 'does not seek to limit the text's meaning to one single interpretation-on the contrary, its dissolution of sense multiplies meaning.' (Lecercle 1994: 20) It often turns out that the nonsense texts need meaning, 'at least as much, and perhaps even more so, than meaningful texts ... ' (ibid: 115) Readers need to use their linguistic imagination to explore the meaning and appreciate the humour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%