Two rhesus monkeys responded on a fixed-ratio schedule in Stimulus 1 (blue light) to avoid the onset of Stimulus 2 (green light). Failure to avoid Stimulus 2 required a second fixedratio performance to avoid Stimulus S (red light) in the presence of which unavoidable shock occurred. Relative frequencies of avoidance performance in the blue light and in the green light were inversely related to the ratio requirement under each stimulus condition. Both differential response-cost and avoidance-failure probability factors were related to the observed changes.Several recent studies of second-order reinforcement schedules (Zimmerman, 1963;Findley and Brady, 1965;Kelleher, 1966;Thomas and Stubbs, 1967;Davison, 1969) (1963) and Findley, Schuster, and Zimmerman (1966) have clearly established the importance of such second-order control in the maintenance of avoidance behavior. Field and Boren (1963), for example, demonstrated discriminative control of an adjusting avoidance performance in rats by stimuli providing information about temporal proximity to shock. Though the animals never effectively escaped from the progression of stimuli preceding shock, they did maintain a level of responding that kept them several discrete steps from the primary aversive event.The present report describes a more direct and extensive analysis of the role of secondorder conditioned aversive stimuli in the maintenance and control of avoidance behavior. Specifically, this experiment analyzes a discriminated avoidance situation characterized by (1)
METHOD Subjects and ApparatusTwo male rhesus monkeys, 3 yr old at the start of the experiment, and each weighing approximately 5 kg, were maintained in primate restraining chairs (Mason, 1958) and enclosed in isolation booths (Foringer) throughout the course of the experiment. A white noise (70 dB re 0.002 dyne/cm2) masked apparatus sound and other extraneous stimuli.In conducting the present research, the investigators adhered to the "Guide for Laboratory Animal Facilities and Care", as