2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new diagnostic to separate line emission from star formation, shocks, and AGNs simultaneously in IFU data

Abstract: In the optical spectra of galaxies, methods for the separation of line emission arising from star formation and an additional hard component, such as shocks or AGN, is wellunderstood and possible with current diagnostics. However, such diagnostics fail when attempting to separate and define line emission which arises from shocked gas, and that arising from AGN. We present a new three-dimensional diagnostic diagram for IFU data which can simultaneously separate the line emission amongst star formation, shocks, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This begs the question of whether the [O III] lines are always related to the central AGN. Indeed, several studies have shown that while the optical line diagnostics can reasonably well separate AGNs and SFs, they are not able to differentiate between line emission arising from non-nuclear shocked gas and that of the AGN (Monreal-Ibero et al 2010;Rich et al 2015;D'Agostino et al 2019;P. Väisänen, private communication) These alternative scenarios may be investigated using X-ray data to check the presence of a torus and using long-slit spectroscopy to map the [O III] distribution notably in the circumnuclear SF rings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This begs the question of whether the [O III] lines are always related to the central AGN. Indeed, several studies have shown that while the optical line diagnostics can reasonably well separate AGNs and SFs, they are not able to differentiate between line emission arising from non-nuclear shocked gas and that of the AGN (Monreal-Ibero et al 2010;Rich et al 2015;D'Agostino et al 2019;P. Väisänen, private communication) These alternative scenarios may be investigated using X-ray data to check the presence of a torus and using long-slit spectroscopy to map the [O III] distribution notably in the circumnuclear SF rings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in the previous case, the complexity of the ionization would be impossible to uncover without a detailed exploration of the shape, distribution, and location in the different diagnostic diagrams, together with the use of the EW(Hα) and the comparison with the spatial distribution of the continuum emission (either stellar or the radio-jet). Additional information, as provided by the gas and stellar kinematics (and the comparison between them), and an analysis of the velocity dispersion and asymmetry of the lines helps to disentangle the real nature of such ionizing sources (D'Agostino et al 2019;López-Cobá et al 2020).…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of the Ionized Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholtz et al 2020). In addition, Hα can suffer from significant obscuration (see also Kewley et al 2013a;D'Agostino et al 2019). Therefore, if we want to use Hα as a SFR tracer we need to determine what is the dominant contributor to the line emission and whether we can identify a component of the Hα emission that can be used to trace star formation in our sample.…”
Section: Origin Of the Hα Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%