2014
DOI: 10.1159/000365724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Cancer Patients

Abstract: Background: The accuracy of the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in cancer patients was tested. An equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was created that was adapted to cancer patients. Methods: Data from 641 oncology patients referred for 51Cr-EDTA measurements were included. Factors that may affect GFR, i.e. gender, hypertension, diabetes, non-ster… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two reports by Funakoshi et al were the only publications that studied Japanese patients with cancer and GFR estimation formulae developed by the JSN [9, 10], while most of other papers evaluated CKD-EPI, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Cockcroft-Gault developed in the United States. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted on nine papers evaluating the accuracy of the CKD-EPI formula, which is currently the most widely used worldwide [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The collective estimate was 81% (95% confidence interval (CI): 71-91%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two reports by Funakoshi et al were the only publications that studied Japanese patients with cancer and GFR estimation formulae developed by the JSN [9, 10], while most of other papers evaluated CKD-EPI, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Cockcroft-Gault developed in the United States. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted on nine papers evaluating the accuracy of the CKD-EPI formula, which is currently the most widely used worldwide [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The collective estimate was 81% (95% confidence interval (CI): 71-91%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creatinine is considered as not a sensitive marker to detect mild and medium decrease of renal function, also known as ‘creatinine blind area’ so that the over estimation of GFR usually occurs and make lots of under diagnosed cases 25 . A study by Daniel Giglio in 2014 showed that CKD-EPIscr equation was precise in cancer patients with GFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-Epi equation model using serum creatinine, sex, age, and race). Information regarding this equation can be found elsewhere [ 30 ]. We categorized eGFR into the following groups: >90, 60 to 90, and <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%