1986
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(86)90180-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new finite-element technique for modelling stable crack growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical methodology to generate a long fatigue crack for fatigue analysis were, usually employed a long narrow slot as a long stationary crack first, and then a short extended crack was made by applying specific node-released strategies, e.g., Newman [1], McClung and Sehitoglu [2], Nakagaki and Atluri [3], Hoff and Rubin [4], Mahanty and Maiti [5] etc. These simulations in crack did not consistent with the ASTM E647 fatigue precracked procedures [6] to produce a long fatigue crack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methodology to generate a long fatigue crack for fatigue analysis were, usually employed a long narrow slot as a long stationary crack first, and then a short extended crack was made by applying specific node-released strategies, e.g., Newman [1], McClung and Sehitoglu [2], Nakagaki and Atluri [3], Hoff and Rubin [4], Mahanty and Maiti [5] etc. These simulations in crack did not consistent with the ASTM E647 fatigue precracked procedures [6] to produce a long fatigue crack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods include most, if not all, of the well developed computational methods: finite difference, finite element, boundary integral equation (boundary element), element free Galerkin, molecular dynamic, and others [Liebowitz et al, 1995] [Aliabadi, 1995]. A large amount of effort, and the effort of this thesis, has been expended on fracture modeling using the fhiite element method (FEM) [Nishioka, 1997] 1985], [Parks, 1974], damage evolution [Lemaitre, 1986], discrete models [Hoff et al, 1986] [Liaw et al, 1984], and others. Some of these methods are cumbersome or inaccurate while others are inappropriate to use as engineering analysis tools in the modeling of discrete crack propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] introduced a technique employing spring and gap elements to circumvent this problem, the method requires a subroutine to control the openings of the gap el-ements and thus does not put crack propagation under total control of the external loadings. In this study, we use nonlinear springs that have no restraining forces beyond a certain critical strain to imitate the failure characteristics of the cohesive material in the interlayer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%