Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction Accurate formulae to predict the optimal insertion length of endotracheal tubes (ETT) are necessary for safe care and have been based on height, weight, age, and ETT size. We believe height best reflects the somatic growth of the trachea. Our goal is to compare a formula generated using height for optimal initial insertion length of ETT to previously published formulae based on height, weight, age, and ETT size. Methods We retrospectively reviewed chest radiographs over a two-year period where the head was assured in midline and midposition. We excluded children with conditions altering tracheal dimensions or stature, and scoliosis. We chose 2 cm above the carina to be the optimal insertion length of the ETT which was then correlated to height. We created linear regression equations and Bland-Altman plots. Results Two hundred three orotracheally intubated children were included. The optimal ETT insertion length using the formula Height (cm)/8 + 3.4 had a high association with linear regression and Bland-Altman plots had the narrowest 95% limits of agreement as compared to previously published formulae. Conclusions We found optimal insertion length = Height (cm)/8 + 3.4 is more accurate as compared to commonly used formulae that are based on weight, age, or ETT size. This formula places the ETT 2 cm above the carina which should be safe until a chest radiograph is obtained. We find that the use of formulae that divide the height by 10 overestimates the depth of insertion in younger, smaller children and underestimates the depth of insertion in older children.
Introduction Accurate formulae to predict the optimal insertion length of endotracheal tubes (ETT) are necessary for safe care and have been based on height, weight, age, and ETT size. We believe height best reflects the somatic growth of the trachea. Our goal is to compare a formula generated using height for optimal initial insertion length of ETT to previously published formulae based on height, weight, age, and ETT size. Methods We retrospectively reviewed chest radiographs over a two-year period where the head was assured in midline and midposition. We excluded children with conditions altering tracheal dimensions or stature, and scoliosis. We chose 2 cm above the carina to be the optimal insertion length of the ETT which was then correlated to height. We created linear regression equations and Bland-Altman plots. Results Two hundred three orotracheally intubated children were included. The optimal ETT insertion length using the formula Height (cm)/8 + 3.4 had a high association with linear regression and Bland-Altman plots had the narrowest 95% limits of agreement as compared to previously published formulae. Conclusions We found optimal insertion length = Height (cm)/8 + 3.4 is more accurate as compared to commonly used formulae that are based on weight, age, or ETT size. This formula places the ETT 2 cm above the carina which should be safe until a chest radiograph is obtained. We find that the use of formulae that divide the height by 10 overestimates the depth of insertion in younger, smaller children and underestimates the depth of insertion in older children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.